User talk:CorporateM: Difference between revisions
→COI questions: reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I'm getting a little nervous as your rewrite appears to be making the document more complex. Thoughts? [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 20:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
:I'm getting a little nervous as your rewrite appears to be making the document more complex. Thoughts? [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 20:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Ok, I see where you're going now. I have to think about how it compares and we'll see which version is preferred by others. Thanks for sticking with it and apologies for my hasty judgement. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 20:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
::Ok, I see where you're going now. I have to think about how it compares and we'll see which version is preferred by others. Thanks for sticking with it and apologies for my hasty judgement. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]]<sup> [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]]</sup> 20:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
== New changes on [[Atos]] page == |
|||
Hey Corporate, thank you for the comprehensive revision that has taken place of the Atos page recently. It looks much better for the clean-up. |
|||
I would like to request one further update regarding the make-up of the company by adding the paragraph below. In my opinion, the current text gives a slightly misleading description of the structure of Atos. Can you have a look at the Atos talk page for my suggestions? thanks in advance. ([[User:tim362729|tim362729]]|[[Usertalk:tim362729|t ]])([[User:tim362729|COI]]) 08:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:34, 11 March 2013
This is CorporateM's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 |
This user is only human. If this user has made a mistake, please be civil and kind in explaining the error. This user is also open to being whacked with a trout. This user reserves the right to remove comments from his own Talk page and report personal attacks to the appropriate boards. |
Hi
Thanks for the input. Any ideas for a title? Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 12:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Oof, I am never very good with titles. Let me stew on it and see if I can come up with something. CorporateM (Talk) 13:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
COI questions
Hey Corporate, I'm wondering if you think this draft request for comment would prove fair and useful? User:Ocaasi/coiquestions. Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 18:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm getting a little nervous as your rewrite appears to be making the document more complex. Thoughts? Ocaasi t | c 20:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I see where you're going now. I have to think about how it compares and we'll see which version is preferred by others. Thanks for sticking with it and apologies for my hasty judgement. Ocaasi t | c 20:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
New changes on Atos page
Hey Corporate, thank you for the comprehensive revision that has taken place of the Atos page recently. It looks much better for the clean-up. I would like to request one further update regarding the make-up of the company by adding the paragraph below. In my opinion, the current text gives a slightly misleading description of the structure of Atos. Can you have a look at the Atos talk page for my suggestions? thanks in advance. (tim362729|t )(COI) 08:34, 11 March 2013 (UTC)