Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WISEPC J234841.10-102844.4: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:19, 13 March 2013

WISEPC J234841.10-102844.4

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominate a number of articles that I think fail WP:NASTRO because they "have little information beyond their physical parameters and discovery circumstances" and it is not the job of Wikipedia to duplicate a data set. These articles follow the same template, they are brown dwarfs discovered by the WISE telescope and I nominated those articles that are not on the List of nearest stars or otherwise notable. Hekerui (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages as explained above:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The content should be merge with the main brown dwarf page. An individual data set is not notable on its own --DavidTTTaylor (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :{{la|WISEPC J234841.10-102844.4}}
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Delete''' The content should be merge with the main brown dwarf page.  An individual data set is not notable on its own --[[User:DavidTTTaylor|DavidTTTaylor]] ([[User talk:DavidTTTaylor|talk]]) 15:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)