Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gatekeepers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Automated comment: AfD was not correctly transcluded. (task 10) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[WP:NOTE|Not notable, non-bestseller]]. Page reads like [[WP:NOTADVERTISING|WP:advertising]] [[WP:PROMOTION|and promotion]] [[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 17:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC) |
[[WP:NOTE|Not notable, non-bestseller]]. Page reads like [[WP:NOTADVERTISING|WP:advertising]] [[WP:PROMOTION|and promotion]] [[User:Malke 2010|Malke 2010]] ([[User talk:Malke 2010|talk]]) 17:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
*<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ([[WP:AFDHOWTO|step 3]]). I have transcluded it to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 13]]. [[User:Snotbot|<span style="font-family: Courier, monospace;letter-spacing:5px;background:#000000;color:#00FF00;padding-left:5px;">Snotbot</span>]] [[User talk:Snotbot|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Snotbot|c]] » 18:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)</small><!--Snotbot relist--> |
*<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ([[WP:AFDHOWTO|step 3]]). I have transcluded it to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 13]]. [[User:Snotbot|<span style="font-family: Courier, monospace;letter-spacing:5px;background:#000000;color:#00FF00;padding-left:5px;">Snotbot</span>]] [[User talk:Snotbot|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Snotbot|c]] » 18:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)</small><!--Snotbot relist--> |
||
*'''RELUCTANT KEEP''' While the page does read like an advertisement, I don't think that's enough to warrant a delete, only a cleanup. And while it wasn't a best-seller, the inclusion of the book on [The New York Times Book Review's List of Notable Books http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/08/books/review/2002notablenonfiction.html?pagewanted=all] is enough to justify notability. [[User:Rwiggum|<span style="color: #4B5320;">Rwiggum</span>]] (<sup>[[User talk:Rwiggum|<font color="Black"><b>Talk</b></font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rwiggum|<font color="Black"><b>Contrib</b></font>]]</sub>) 20:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:13, 13 March 2013
- The Gatekeepers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, non-bestseller. Page reads like WP:advertising and promotion Malke 2010 (talk) 17:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 13. Snotbot t • c » 18:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- RELUCTANT KEEP While the page does read like an advertisement, I don't think that's enough to warrant a delete, only a cleanup. And while it wasn't a best-seller, the inclusion of the book on [The New York Times Book Review's List of Notable Books http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/08/books/review/2002notablenonfiction.html?pagewanted=all] is enough to justify notability. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 20:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)