Jump to content

In re Primus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cydebot (talk | contribs)
m Robot - Moving category United States free speech case law to Category:United States Free Speech Clause case law per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 March 21.
Primus is the attorney, not Powell. Justice Powell wrote the Court's opinion.
Line 23: Line 23:


== Background ==
== Background ==
Powell was an attorney for the South Carolina affiliate of the [[ACLU]]. South Carolina had a policy of sterilizing certain women as a condition of receiving welfare. Powell sent letters to women who had been thusly sterilized, offering the legal assistance of the ACLU. The South Carolina's Supreme Court disciplinary board reprimanded Powell for violating South Carolina bar rules against soliciting business. The South Carolina Supreme Court approved the discipline. Powell appealed to the US Supreme Court.
Primus was an attorney for the South Carolina affiliate of the [[ACLU]]. South Carolina had a policy of sterilizing certain women as a condition of receiving welfare. Primus sent letters to women who had been thusly sterilized, offering the legal assistance of the ACLU. The South Carolina's Supreme Court disciplinary board reprimanded Primus for violating South Carolina bar rules against soliciting business. The South Carolina Supreme Court approved the discipline. Primus appealed to the US Supreme Court.


== Opinion of the Court ==
== Opinion of the Court ==

Revision as of 17:55, 15 March 2013

In re Primus
Argued January 16, 1978
Decided May 30, 1978
Full case nameIn re Primus
Citations436 U.S. 412 (more)
Holding
Solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
MajorityPowell, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Stevens; Marshall (all but the first paragraph of part VI)
ConcurrenceBlackmun
ConcurrenceMarshall
DissentRehnquist
Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV

In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.

Background

Primus was an attorney for the South Carolina affiliate of the ACLU. South Carolina had a policy of sterilizing certain women as a condition of receiving welfare. Primus sent letters to women who had been thusly sterilized, offering the legal assistance of the ACLU. The South Carolina's Supreme Court disciplinary board reprimanded Primus for violating South Carolina bar rules against soliciting business. The South Carolina Supreme Court approved the discipline. Primus appealed to the US Supreme Court.

Opinion of the Court

The US Supreme Court overturned the discipline, ruling that solicitation of prospective litigants by nonprofit organizations that engage in litigation as a form of political expression and political association constitutes expressive and associational conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.

See also

References

  • Text of In re Primus - 436 U.S. 412 (1978) is available from: Justia