Jump to content

Thermal desorption spectroscopy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mkosterv (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mkosterv (talk | contribs)
Line 118: Line 118:
where:
where:
<math> \sigma_0 </math> TDS or TPD peak surface.
<math> \sigma_0 </math> is the surface area of a TDS or TPD peak.


A graph of <math> \ln({\sigma_0 T_p}) </math> versus <math> 1/T_p </math> results in a straight line with an angle of <math>-E_{act}/R</math>.
A graph of <math> \ln({\sigma_0 T_p}) </math> versus <math> 1/T_p </math> results in a straight line with an angle of <math>-E_{act}/R</math>.

Revision as of 11:13, 25 March 2013

Thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS), also known as temperature programmed desorption (TPD) is the method of observing desorbed molecules from a surface when the surface temperature is increased. Many researchers prefer the name TPD because it is not a spectroscopic method.

Desorption

When molecules come in contact with a surface, they adsorb onto it, minimizing their energy by forming a chemical bond with the surface. The binding energy varies with the combination of the adsorbate and surface. If the surface is heated, at one point, the energy transferred to the adsorbed species will cause it to desorb. The temperature at which this happens is known as the desorption temperature. Thus TDS shows information on the binding energy.

Measurement

Since TDS observes the mass of desorbed molecules, it shows what molecules are adsorbed on the surface. Moreover, TDS recognizes the different adsorption conditions of the same molecule from the differences between the desorption temperatures of molecules desorbing different sites at the surface, e.g. terraces vs steps. TDS also obtains the amounts of adsorbed molecules on the surface from the intensity of the peaks of the TDS spectrum, and the total amount of adsorbed species is shown by the integral of the spectrum.

To measure TDS, one needs a mass spectrometer, such as a quadrupole mass spectrometer or a time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer, under ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions. The amount of adsorbed molecules is measured by increasing the temperature at a heating rate of typically 2 K/s to 10 K/s. Several masses may be simultaneously measured by the mass spectrometer, and the intensity of each mass as a function of temperature is obtained as a TDS spectrum.

The heating procedure is often controlled by the PID control algorithm, with the controller being either a computer or specialised equipment such as a Eurotherm.

Other methods of measuring desorption are Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) or using infrared detectors, thermal conductivity detectors etc.

Quantitative Interpretation of TDS data

TDS Spectrum 1 A Thermal Desorption Spectrum of NO absorbed on Platinum-Rhodium (100) single crystal. The unit of the x-axis is temperature in Kelvin, the unit of the y-axis is an arbitrary unit, in fact the intensity of a mass spectrometer measurement.
TDS Spectrum 2 A Thermal Desorption Spectrum of NO absorbed on Platinum-Rhodium (100) single crystal. The spectra of several NO coverages are combined in one spectrum. The unit of the x-axis is temperature in Kelvin, the unit of the y-axis is an arbitrary unit, in fact the intensity of a mass spectrometer measurement.

TDS spectrum 1 and 2 are typical examples of a TDS measurement. Both TDS are examples of NO desorbing from a single crystal in high vacuum. The crystal was mounted on a titanium filament and heated with current. The desorbing NO was measured using a mass spectrometer monitoring the atomic mass of 30.

Before 1990 analysis of a TDS spectrum was usually done using a so called simplified method; the "Redhead" method,[1] assuming the exponential prefactor and the desorption energy to be independent of the surface coverage. After 1990 and with use of computer algorithms TDS spectra were analyzed using the "complete analysis method" [2] or the "leading edge method" [3]. These methods assume the exponential prefactor and the desorption energy to be dependent of the surface coverage. Several available methods of analyzing TDS are described and compared in an article by A.M. de JONG and J.W. NIEMANTSVERDRIET [4]







Theoretical Introduction

We describe a model of desorption at a linear rate:
(equation 1)

where:

the heating rate in [K/s]
the start temperature in [K]
the time in [s]

We assume that the pump rate of the system is indefinitely large, thus no gasses will absorb during the desorption. The change in pressure during desorption is described as:
(equation 2)

where:

the pressure in the system
the time in [s]

where:

where:

the sample surface [m2]
a constant
volume of the system [m3]

where:

the desoption rate [mol/cm2 sec]

where:

where:

the pump rate
volume of the system [m3]

When we assume that is indefinitely large:
(equation 3)

Thermal desorption is usually described with the Arrhenius equation:
(equation 4)

where:

the desorption rate[mol/cm2 sec]
order of desorption
surface coverage
pre-exponential factor [Hz]
activation energy of desoption [kJ/mol]
gas constant
temperature [K]

Using the before mentioned Redhead method (a methode less precise as the "complete analysis" or the "leading edge" method) and the temperature maximum one can determine the activation energy:
(equation 5)
for n=1


(equation 6)
for n=2

M. Ehasi en K. Christmann [5] have described a simple method to determine the activation energy of the second order. Equation 6 can be changed into:
(equation 6a)

where: is the surface area of a TDS or TPD peak.

A graph of versus results in a straight line with an angle of .

Thus in a first order reaction the is independent of the surface coverage. Changing the surface coverage one can determine . Usually a fixed value of the pre-exponential factor is used and is known, with these values one can derive the iteratively from .

See also

References

  1. ^ Redhead, P. A. "Thermal desorption of gases" Vacuum 12 (1962) p.203-211
  2. ^ D.A. King, Surface Science 47 (1975) p 384.
  3. ^ E. Habenschaden and J. Küppers, Surface Science 138 (1984) 147
  4. ^ A.M. de JONG and J.W. NIEMANTSVERDRIET, Surface Science 233 (1990) 355-365
  5. ^ M. Ehasi, K. Christmann, Surface Science 172 (1988)