User talk:Merenjith

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles. SRM 2 HRM (talk) 10:58, 30 March 2013‎ (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kunchacko Boban. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.JK (talk) 14:53, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Merenjith, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Merenjith! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Your recent editing history at Kunchacko Boban shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JK (talk) 04:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

• This edit violated 3RR at Kunchacko Boban. If you think the maintenance concerns have been addressed, explain why at Talk:Kunchacko Boban, and other editors may agree and remove the tags. However, if you remove the tags again, you are in peril of being blocked for edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 04:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 13:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

• I've reverted a number of edits you made to other articles, such as this one to Shahid Kapoor. The templates appear to have been added in a tit-for-tat over the templates at the Kunchacko article. Adding invalid templates is disruptive; you may not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. Please review the guidelines for editors during your block or before you begin editing after your block. If you were to head down the same path, you could lose your editing privileges indefinitely. —C.Fred (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)