User talk:NickW557

Welcome To My User Talk Page! Please keep the following in mind when leaving messages here: Always sign and date your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. If you're starting a new discussion, please create a new section. You can do this by clicking the link in the box above. If you're continuing a previous discussion, please edit its existing section. Please keep comments civil. Personal attacks and vandalism will be summarily removed. Replies: I will respond to your message here. I will likely ping you so you'll receive a notification that I've replied. Email: Please email me only if your request contains private information. An email will not speed up my reply, as I receive an email alert every time a message is left on this page. Archiving: Old discussions are archived to keep this page at a reasonable length. You can use the archive box below to view and search through old archives. I will do my best to get back to you in a timely manner. It usually takes me between 30 minutes and 24 hours to post a reply.

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

• Op-ed: We must do more to turn readers into editors

• News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm

• Featured content: Slow week for featured content

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

• From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger

• News and notes: Finance committee updates

• Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes

• Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns

• WikiProject report: Setting a precedent

• Technology report: Article Feedback reversal

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Ayyan

i dont know some people is changing my wiki page... this is the official management of Ayyan( middle east n pakistan super model Her name is only Ayyan she dont user her Surname and some other person repeatly changing my wiki page to ayyan ali this is too much violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merocks9 (talk • contribs) 09:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I have also left you a message on your talk page, but I will state it again here as well as an update based on your message. First of all, if you disagree with the article's title, the solution is not to keep blanking the page. That will not solve anything and it is highly disruptive. If you want the article moved back to the other title, discuss it on the article's talk page.
Now, based on your statement above that you are involved with the subject of the article, I need to strongly advise you to read our conflict of interest guidelines and understand that you do not own the article, anyone can edit it. Editing that can be interpreted as disruptive, coupled with an admitted conflict of interest, can lead to your account being blocked. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 09:59, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

• News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee

• WikiProject report: Making music

• Interview: Meeting in the middle: Wikipedia and libraries

• Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm

• Arbitration report: Richard case closes

• Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Jakubovic

Just letting you know, Nick. That recent contribution to Daniel Jakubovic's page was in fact from a credible source, and true. If you are interested... I can direct you to said female's Facebook page for reference.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.100.15 (talk) 02:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid that even a claim by a third party on Facebook that such behavior had occurred would not be a verifiable reliable source to satisfy WP:BLP, given the undue negative connotation that goes along with this kind of claim in a biography of a living person. However, you're welcome to take your source to the article's talk page and see if consensus can be reached on possible inclusion in a way that would not violate WP:BLP, but I doubt it; Wikipedia takes the BLP policy very seriously. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 03:07, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

On a related note, now that you've gotten me interested in this article :) and after doing some research, I've opened up an Articles for Deletion discussion to decide if the article should be deleted as failing notability guidelines. If you're interested in contributing to the discussion, go here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Jakubovic. Cheers! --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 03:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

jak and daxter

thats ok thanks just trying to figure this all out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.233.125 (talk) 10:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

No worries :) let me know if there's anything I can do to help! --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 20:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

My post is in accordance to the related subject

Sir , I am an Indian and I got married in an arranged marriage.I have given a video of my own marriage(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00ubqyUMUe0) . May I know why it is not constructive to you? Thanks a lot. Payel Chatterjee Bangalore India — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.166.101.139 (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for contacting me. By reviewing Wikipedia's external links guideline, you can see that external links in articles should be kept to a minimum with links that specifically relate to the discussion and/or research of the topic at hand. Wikipedia is not a collection of links to content that are just related to the article at hand. While I appreciate that your YouTube video depicts the ceremony of an arranged marriage, it still does not conform with guidelines for inclusion, because it is not an encyclopedic discussion of the topic of arranged marriage. I'm sure you can appreciate the fact that many personal videos exist of people's marriages, arranged or otherwise, but that does not mean that they should be included in Wikipedia. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 20:18, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

• WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh

• Featured content: One and a half soursops

• Arbitration report: Two open cases

• News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews

• Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?

• Recent research: "Ignore all rules" in deletions; anonymity and groupthink; how readers react when shown talk pages

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting vandalism to my talk page. I just noticed it so this is belated as hell. But I appreciate what you do!! Cheers 4twenty42o (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Five minutes started creating new article, and you immediately marked unfinished content as junk.

Does such actions encourage to use Wikipedia? To add value to it? I start writing something, and immediately said that I do junk. Thank you! EugenyBrychkov (talk) 21:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I apologize if you feel like you've been discouraged from creating content. Wikipedia is happy to accept content that meets our policies. Using the main article space for test pages is not in accordance with these policies. I would like to suggest that you use a "sandbox" in your own userspace (possibly: User:EugenyBrychkov/sandbox) to create test content. Once you have built up the content and it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, it can be moved into the article space. That is the easiest way to write content and be allowed ample time to bring it to an acceptable level without being subject to the scrutiny of content in the article space in the meantime. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 21:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Not accepted. Test page was residing in my own user page space. If it is named "test" does not give you a right to remove it immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EugenyBrychkov (talk • contribs) 21:38, 4 April 2013‎

Your "user space" means any pages that have "User:EugenyBrychkov" before it, such as your main user page and any subpages, which begin with "User:EugenyBrychkov/...". Your page was not in the user space; it was in the main article space. Please see WP:USERSPACE and CSD G2. --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 21:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Eugeny, the page that was deleted was Eugenys test page in the main article space; I assume based on your comments above that you started it there by accident. Anyway, I've undeleted it and moved it to: User:EugenyBrychkov/Eugenys test page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

C/f User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Creation_of_articles_is_not_allowed_-.3E_your_work_goes_to_junk. 88.104.28.176 (talk) 21:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)