Talk:Amgen: Difference between revisions
update importance for wikiproject companies to high per project guidelines, as an S&P component this only makes sense. |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Companies|class=Start|importance= |
{{WikiProject Companies|class=Start|importance=high}} |
||
{{WikiProject California|class=Start|importance=|southerncalifornia=yes}} |
{{WikiProject California|class=Start|importance=|southerncalifornia=yes}} |
||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 10:43, 11 April 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Removal of certain "key people" from infobox
- Chad Carlile: this person is not listed on the Amgen.com website.
- The inclusion of this person is presumably based on information found in the Fall 2004 APSA Newsletter (see http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/APSA_News_F-04.pdf) in which his role is described as follows: "Within Amgen, Chad works as a Senior Curriculum Designer at the organization’s headquarters in Thousand Oaks, CA. His group is part of a larger training function in the organization that trains new and existing employees on task- and product-specific qualities."
- Removing this piece of information is a matter of addressing notability of content
- Mark Hutt, Pritesh Patel: these people are not listed on the Amgen.com website.
- I have not been able to find information that links a "Mark Hutt" or "Pritesh Patel" or "Hutt" or "P. Patel" to Amgen through basic searches with Google
- Removing this piece of information is a matter of addressing verifiability of content
Courtland 04:34, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Article search redirects to AMGEN
I am wondering if someone might know the reasoning why a search for "Immunex" redirects to this Amgen article? I ask this because Immunex (a Biotech R&D company) was founded in the 1980's and had quite a notable history of accomplishments before it was acquired by Amgen in 2001. If no one has any objections, I would like to set up an Immunex article, which can, of course, redirect the reader to the Amgen article, should they want to read more about the company by whom Immunex was acquired. Does anyone know how I can find out if there was formerly a Wiki article on Immunex? Thank you kindly. Tell someone (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Remove?
This looks more like advertisement than en encyclopaedial article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siriussounds (talk • contribs) 11:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- The way to deal with that is to add more WP:NPOV material critical of the company, maybe in a "Criticism" section. Here's a couple http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/health/25amgen.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/us/medicare-pricing-delay-is-political-win-for-amgen-drug-maker.html?hp&_r=0&gwh=9634789278CF43115AE6C27876406B86&pagewanted=all --Nbauman (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class company articles
- High-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- Start-Class Southern California articles
- Unknown-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles