User talk:2001:5B0:23FF:2EF0:0:0:0:39: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:49, 15 April 2013

April 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

EdJohnston (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:5B0:23FF:2EF0:0:0:0:39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was my little brother.....

Decline reason:

See WP:BROTHER. You comment below makes an unblock that much more unlikely. Kuru LOL Never saw that f*cking page before (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May I just note that is not a valid argument for unblocking an editor, see the appeal a block guideline. TB randley 00:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't give a f*ck about that

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == April 2013 ==
 <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for persistent [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]].  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 00:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
-{{unblock reviewed | 1=It was my little brother..... | decline=See [[WP:BROTHER]].  You comment below makes an unblock that much more unlikely. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 00:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)}}
+{{unblock reviewed | 1=It was my little brother..... | decline=See [[WP:BROTHER]].  You comment below makes an unblock that much more unlikely. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]]
+LOL Never saw that f*cking page before [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 00:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)}}
 :May I just note that is not a valid argument for unblocking an editor, see the [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal a block]] guideline. '''[[User:TBrandley#top|<span style="color:darkorange">TB</span>]][[User talk:TBrandley#top|<span style="color:red">randley</span>]]''' 00:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 I don't give a f*ck about that