Talk:ServiceMaster: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:43, 25 May 2006

The company objectives seem a little over the top for an encycolpedia entry, don't you think? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.57.225.195 (talk • contribs) .

Well, as long as the company meets the notability guidelines for companies and corporations, it's fair game for Wikipedia. ServiceMaster meets #2 of the notability criteria; it is listed on a well-known ranking index, the Fortune 500. Also, many of the ServiceMaster brands are well-known, such as Terminix. SCHZMO ✍ 20:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:27, 25 May 2006 edit 66.57.225.195 (talk) No edit summary		Revision as of 20:43, 25 May 2006 edit undo Schzmo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 5,541 edits reply Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The company objectives seem a little over the top for an encycolpedia entry, don't you think?		The company objectives seem a little over the top for an encycolpedia entry, don't you think? <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages\|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:66.57.225.195\|66.57.225.195]] ([[User talk:66.57.225.195\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/66.57.225.195\|contribs]]) {{{2\|}}}.</small><!-- [Template:Unsigned] -->
			:Well, as long as the company meets the [[WP:COMP\|notability guidelines for companies and corporations]], it's fair game for Wikipedia. ServiceMaster meets #2 of the notability criteria; it is listed on a well-known ranking index, the Fortune 500. Also, many of the ServiceMaster brands are well-known, such as Terminix. '''''[[User:Schzmo#\|<font color="#6495ed">SCH</font><font color="#3cb371">ZMO</font>]]''''' [[User talk:Schzmo\|✍]] 20:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)