Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic exe: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Dialectric (talk | contribs) →Sonic exe: vote delete |
→Sonic exe: delete |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''' - unencyclopedic article lacking reliable sources, created by an [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA]] as possibly promotional. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 21:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - unencyclopedic article lacking reliable sources, created by an [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA]] as possibly promotional. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 21:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. I found two refs from [[WP:VG/RS|reliable]] sources ([http://www.gamesradar.com/radarplays-sonicexe/ ''GamesRadar''] and [https://www.gameinformer.com/blogs/members/b/jordanthegamer_blog/archive/2012/10/27/jtg-horror-fiction-sonic-exe.aspx ''GameInformer'']), but they aren't detailed enough to establish notability. Even including these two, there isn't enough information available to create an encyclopedic article without resorting to original research: doesn't pass [[WP:GNG|GNG]]. <span style='font:1em"Avenir";background:#CCF;padding:2px 4px'>[[User:Czar|<font color="#B048B5">''czar''</font>]] [[User_talk:Czar|<font color="#888">·</font>]] [[Special:Contribs/Czar|<font color="#888">·</font>]]</span> 00:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:47, 22 April 2013
- Sonic exe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A completely unorganized set of ideas that is basically original research. Unencyclopedic. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 17:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Delete per WP:OR. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - unencyclopedic article lacking reliable sources, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I found two refs from reliable sources (GamesRadar and GameInformer), but they aren't detailed enough to establish notability. Even including these two, there isn't enough information available to create an encyclopedic article without resorting to original research: doesn't pass GNG. czar · · 00:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)