Talk:One-child policy: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 90d) to Talk:One-child policy/Archive 1. |
they call babies jjhdskfuhue |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/116.55.65.71|116.55.65.71]] ([[User talk:116.55.65.71|talk]]) 17:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/116.55.65.71|116.55.65.71]] ([[User talk:116.55.65.71|talk]]) 17:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
↔ |
|||
Revision as of 16:38, 23 April 2013
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One-child policy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | China B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph of billboard advertising be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in China may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Hui people
The Huis are exempted from this policy. This could be incorporated into the article by the main contributors.
- http://books.google.com.bh/books?id=pA_MP4Q11qgC&pg=PA123&dq=Hui+one+child&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lYQBT62DGMfU8gORsoG4AQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Hui%20one%20child&f=false
- http://books.google.com.bh/books?id=gwjeKt7yMogC&pg=PA139&dq=Hui+one+child&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lYQBT62DGMfU8gORsoG4AQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Hui%20one%20child&f=false
Joyson Prabhu Holla at me! 10:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Can't immediately document this but I believe (was told this when I visited China) that an exemption or special allowance applied to all national minority ethnic groups, especially those living in rural areas. I don't think there's a particular reason to single out the Hui. Hopefully more general documentation can be found.~Mack2~ 04:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Forced sterilizations
Hello, it would be nice to have some more info on forced sterilizations. These old slogans (now getting phased out) corroborate roumors that in some cases tubes used to be (or perhaps still are?) forcibly tied immediately after women give birth, in the labour room? 220.246.134.47 (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Growth rate plot / misleading caption
Hello, I feel that the graph of population growth vs. year does not support the notion of 'strong growth in spite of the one-child poliy'. the growth is clearly (albeit slightly) sub-linear whereas an exponential rate were to be expected without birth-control measures - however, the actual reason might be a decreasing birth rate due to increasing wealth outsizing any effect of population control measures. what do other people think ? does anybody have references addressing the separation of said factors ? comment added by Q-lio (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- I agree it's not really strong growth; I've removed the "strong" qualifier to make it more reasonable. Since the fertility rate has been below replacement since the 1990's, all the growth since then comes from the demographic momentum, which only a "zero-child policy" could have prevented. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Fairly accurate article
Having some amount of expertise on this subject, I would like to commend the Wikipedia community for posting a fairly accurate depiction of the one-child policy in China. Most Americans I talk to imagine a draconian policy rigidly enforced. This Wikipedia article gives some idea of the vagarities involved, while still explaining what the policy was supposed to be, as well as a useful graph showing the steady increase in population. Good job Wikipedia!