Talk:A Pale View of Hills

Untitled

Could this article be edited to be more objective? Also, granted the author left a lot of things unsaid, to be inferred by the reader, but where was it hinted that Jiro died "in a war"? What war?

Speculation?

Many of the facts stated in the summary here sound like things that were brought up in a discussion in an English class. None of the reasons why Keiko commited suicide were brought up in the book. In fact, there really was not much brought up in the book at all. I'm sure that what is written isn't wrong, but that is more insight on the part of a particular reader than part of the plot. Also, at the end of the summary it is stated that Etsuko projected her life through her making up Mariko and Sachiko. I did not find any evidence in the book, though I did not read very carefully. If I am correct and this is total speculation as well, this should be removed, or placed in a section in which such insight would be appropriate.

I just finished the novel (I love Ishiguro). I agree that much of what's written on this page is one reader's interpretation of the novel (valid or not) and is not a plot summary. There is much in this novel that's left to the reader's interpretation. Nonetheless, wikipedia does not exist to interpret novels. If I get a chance I may do a large rewrite of this page. Joshua Crowgey 01:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:KazuoIshiguro APaleViewOfHills.jpg

Image:KazuoIshiguro APaleViewOfHills.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

prize?

Resolved

The [[1]] Royal Society does not list a "Winnifred Holtby Prize". Is this award legitimate? -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it exists but since discontinued. Christopher Connor (talk) 06:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Article?

This article is really really thin, and failed to approach nearly anything Ishiguro says about the novel. I'm currently working on a psychoanalytic reading of this novel... Afterwards, I'll go through my sources and try to redo this page with some actual citations, and have it follow along more what Ishiguro claims the novel to be about. You would think people would do research before writing about a book... Especially one this complex. 129.114.209.31 (talk) 04:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)