Overlawyered: Difference between revisions
m fmt, official web site template |
Openmikenite (talk | contribs) Added affiliation with Cato |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The subject of the site is absurdities,<ref name=courttv>{{cite news|url=http://www.courttv.com/news/cow/072501_overlawyered_ctv.html|publisher=Court TV|title=Chasing the Ambulance Chasers|author=By Adrien Seybert|date=2001-07-25}}</ref> excesses,<ref name="forbes">{{cite news|publisher=Forbes|title=Seventh-Amendment Follies|author=William Baldwin|url=http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/0411/020.html|date=2005-04-11}}</ref> and abuse<ref name="lvrj">{{cite news|url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2000/May-01-Mon-2000/opinion/13452638.html|publisher=Las Vegas Review Journal|date=2000-05-01|title=Editorial:Our overlawyered society}}</ref><!--though an editorial this characterization seems like a neutral claim and is probably fact-checked--> of the American [[tort law]] system. Its regular readership includes thousands of lawyers in the United states, as well as physicians, and readers in other countries considering American-style tort systems.<ref name=lawcom/><ref name=courttv/> |
The subject of the site is absurdities,<ref name=courttv>{{cite news|url=http://www.courttv.com/news/cow/072501_overlawyered_ctv.html|publisher=Court TV|title=Chasing the Ambulance Chasers|author=By Adrien Seybert|date=2001-07-25}}</ref> excesses,<ref name="forbes">{{cite news|publisher=Forbes|title=Seventh-Amendment Follies|author=William Baldwin|url=http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/0411/020.html|date=2005-04-11}}</ref> and abuse<ref name="lvrj">{{cite news|url=http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2000/May-01-Mon-2000/opinion/13452638.html|publisher=Las Vegas Review Journal|date=2000-05-01|title=Editorial:Our overlawyered society}}</ref><!--though an editorial this characterization seems like a neutral claim and is probably fact-checked--> of the American [[tort law]] system. Its regular readership includes thousands of lawyers in the United states, as well as physicians, and readers in other countries considering American-style tort systems.<ref name=lawcom/><ref name=courttv/> |
||
On April 26, 2013, Olson announced the blog had affiliated itself with the [[Cato Institute]], where he is a senior fellow.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://overlawyered.com/2013/04/overlawyered-now-cato-institute-blog|title=Overlawyered: now a Cato Institute blog|first=Walter|last=Olson|date=2013-04-16|accessdate=2013-04-28}}</ref> |
|||
==Dispute with aviation tort lawyer== |
==Dispute with aviation tort lawyer== |
||
Revision as of 23:46, 28 April 2013
 | The relevance of particular information in (or previously in) this article or section is disputed. (November 2010) |
Overlawyered is a law blog on the subject of tort reform run by author Walter Olson. Founded in 1999, it is "widely considered to be the oldest legal blog and is also one of the most popular", according to Law.com.[1]
The subject of the site is absurdities,[2] excesses,[3] and abuse[4] of the American tort law system. Its regular readership includes thousands of lawyers in the United states, as well as physicians, and readers in other countries considering American-style tort systems.[1][2]
On April 26, 2013, Olson announced the blog had affiliated itself with the Cato Institute, where he is a senior fellow.[5]
Dispute with aviation tort lawyer
Aviation tort lawyer Arthur Alan Wolk has sued Overlawyered, Olson, and contributors Ted Frank and David Nieporent for libel over a post written by Frank.[6][7] Judge Mary A. McLaughlin ruled that Overlawyered is a "mass medium" and dismissed the case because Wolk did not file within the one-year statute of limitations.[6][8][9] Wolk has appealed his loss.[6][8]
References
- ^ a b C.C. Holland (2008-12j-08). "How to Build a Better Law Blog". Law.com.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b By Adrien Seybert (2001-07-25). "Chasing the Ambulance Chasers". Court TV.
- ^ William Baldwin (2005-04-11). "Seventh-Amendment Follies". Forbes.
- ^ "Editorial:Our overlawyered society". Las Vegas Review Journal. 2000-05-01.
- ^ Olson, Walter (2013-04-16). "Overlawyered: now a Cato Institute blog". Retrieved 2013-04-28.
- ^ a b c Jacob Sullum, Reason, "Lawyer Trying to Protect His Reputation As an Effective Advocate Misses Deadline for His Libel Suit", August 6, 2010
- ^ http://www.whiteandwilliams.com/CM/Publications/COURTDISMISSESDEFAMATIONCLAIMAGAINSTLEGALBLOG.asp
- ^ a b Shannon P. Duffy, The Legal Intelligencer, Discovery Rule for Libel Doesn't Apply to Blogs, Says Federal Judge, August 6, 2010
- ^ Jeff Blumenthal, Philadelphia Business Journal, Overlawyered blog case testing statute of limitations for defamation, August 6, 2010
External links
 | This website-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |