User talk:JakobSteenberg/Archives/1

hi!

Hello! JakobSteenberg, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Those hairy Latins

Good call. Latin has many words for hair, it seems. It all rather depends what type of hair it is.

Badly laid out, from Google Translate:

caesaries hair, curls, locks, long hair, hair of the beard

capillus - hair, beard, wool, hair of the beard

crinis = hair, long hair, tentacle, tail

capillatura - hair, false hair

coma - hair, coma, lock, plume, mane, aigrette

pilus - hair, trifle

saeta - thick, hair, bristle, coarse, brush

seta - thick, hair, bristle, coarse, brush

villus - hair, shaggy hair, nap of clothes

umbra - ghost, shade, shadow, dark, darkness, hair

plantaria - sets, slips, hair, cuttings

capillatio - hair

From this list I have no idea which one to choose Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Infobox location

Hi, thanks for tweaking anatomy articles. However, I noticed that your are systematically placing infoboxes above dablinks and maintenance tags. WP:LEAD recommends the opposite. Is there a good reason for changing this in anatomy articles? --Fama Clamosa (talk) 06:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

OK. I thought those edits had something to do with the information on your user page: "users of Nomina Anatomica have easy access to information on wikipedia". I'm not going to revert you, but someone will sooner or later because most editors conform to the WP:MoS guidelines. Happy editing! --Fama Clamosa (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

R from alternative language

Hello. You have a new message at Wdchk's talk page. – Wdchk (talk) 01:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anterior surface of the heart, JakobSteenberg!

Wikipedia editor Senator2029 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

When creating a redirect, please categorize it too. See Template:R template index for a list of templates to use.

To reply, leave a comment on Senator2029's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks

Thanks for posting at WP:MED2013GA. Great choice. Let me know if you need any assistance! Best. Biosthmors (talk) 00:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem! I'll try to rephrase that a bit. =) Thanks for your work on anatomy articles. Do you want to bring any of those up to GA status? If so, feel free to list there still. Do you have any particular targets? No worries about feeling "unqualified". I brought DVT up to GA without a M.D. (I'm pre-med also). Thankfully, some M.D.s have given me feedback (see Wikipedia:Peer_review/Deep_vein_thrombosis/archive3). I'd like to get it to become a featured article relatively soon. Best! Biosthmors (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll try to push it on someone! What if I tried to push human anatomy on you?! ;-) I could help out with that one. I should read up on that subject for myself anyways. Interested? Biosthmors (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

It seems like the whole Approaches section should be mostly meaningful prose instead of being a list in line with WP:PROSE and WP:SS. So section(s)/paragraph(s) should exist to summarize the human nervous system, etc. That's the biggest opportunity I see for improvement. Human body gets a lot of views too. I'm not sure why separate articles are really needed at this point, but whatever. Biosthmors (talk) 04:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Translation request

Hi Jakob, is it possible for you to translate this page to Danish? ●Mehran ^Debate● 12:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I will post a first draft below later along with a question or two. Before I start, you use the term reader, is it okay if I translate this to browser (That is the term used in Danish as well)?

But when I am done you might want to throw it by another native Danish speaker since some of the terms like Portable Pre-indexed ZIM is hard to make a proper translation of without making it sound like a machine translation. --JakobSteenberg (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much buddy. This is excellent and adequate for me. So quick and nice job :) ●Mehran ^Debate● 15:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I submitted your translation here. There is an article named Kiwix and it doesn't have a Danish version. It would be good if you can create this article in your Wikipedia too, you can do that in your free time and there is no rush! Thanks again and best wishes ●Mehran ^Debate● 05:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Tibia

I was going through tibia and I noticed a fair amount of overlinking so I recommend trying the script at Wikipedia:Highlight duplicate links to spot these! I ordered some textbooks but it will be a while before they arrive. Not so much in time for February! Do you have an idea for what kind of anatomy article you might want to work on in March? I'd like for it to be something that lists at the WP:5000 consistently from being so popular. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 01:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I will look into it. Hmm... I was planning on doing more work on the leg and since arteries and veins have been suggested on Anatomy project then starting on femoral artery and working my way down through out march. I have not found anything on the top5000 that really cought my interest, but I only got to 3000-and-something... any suggestions since you ask? --JakobSteenberg (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey JakobSteenberg; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, JakobSteenberg. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Creative_Commons_Attribution-Noncommercial_3.0_United_States_License.
Message added SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

• News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee

• WikiProject report: Making music

• Interview: Meeting in the middle: Wikipedia and libraries

• Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm

• Arbitration report: Richard case closes

• Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 06:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

• WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh

• Featured content: One and a half soursops

• Arbitration report: Two open cases

• News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews

• Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?

• Recent research: "Ignore all rules" in deletions; anonymity and groupthink; how readers react when shown talk pages

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 22:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

• Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Special: FAQs

• Featured content: What the ?

• News and notes: Grants given for Wikipedia Library, six others; April Fool's Day ructions

• Arbitration report: Three open cases

• Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 12:54, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

• Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry

• WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes

• News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer

• Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History

• Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry

• Technology report: Testing week

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 06:47, 10 April 2013 (UTC)