Jump to content

Talk:The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Updated classification
Line 12: Line 12:


I think the article should be moved to The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin, or the original Japanese romaji name. It makes no sense to have an artice that says "The Adventures of Scamper the Penguin (The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin outside the USA)" when the film isnt from the USA, and the Wikipedia isnt only for the USA readers, but all English speaking readers.
I think the article should be moved to The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin, or the original Japanese romaji name. It makes no sense to have an artice that says "The Adventures of Scamper the Penguin (The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin outside the USA)" when the film isnt from the USA, and the Wikipedia isnt only for the USA readers, but all English speaking readers.

== Move "Scamper" Into A Separate Article. ==

I agree with this comment left by ?

...

However the U.S.A. and Hollywood has officially changed the film name to "Scamper". I bet Hollywood has even destroyed the U.K. English Dub, forcing everybody to either watch the Scamper drivel or to learn another language. Sadly, Scamper is enjoyed by millions of people. Even more depressing is the fact that Scamper is 110000000000000000000000000000% more notable than Lolo. I can barely find any existence of Lolo. Yes. Hollywood is THAT powerful.

Lolo is available in Russian, Japanese, English, and at least one other language.

Scamper is available in English and I am not sure about other languages.

Just because the footage is the same, the two films ARE different because Scamper changed the entire production design and diluted the story (deleting half of the original story's CONCLUSION!)

They NEED separate articles. Due to the availability of Lolo in at least four languages, there has to be a large audience somewhere in the world and they would enjoy an official Lolo article.

I cannot read these other languages. This means that if there are approved websites out there that can establish notability for an official Lolo article, I would not be able to read those websites because they would be in a different language that I have not yet learned.

Even more so, I don't think Wiki would even consider considering thinking about considering approving two articles, or changing the name of this one.

We are probably stuck with Scamper.

[[User:In Correct|In Correct]] ([[User talk:In Correct|talk]]) 08:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


== Names and Censorship ==
== Names and Censorship ==

Revision as of 08:50, 2 May 2013

Article Title

I think the article should be moved to The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin, or the original Japanese romaji name. It makes no sense to have an artice that says "The Adventures of Scamper the Penguin (The Adventures of Lolo the Penguin outside the USA)" when the film isnt from the USA, and the Wikipedia isnt only for the USA readers, but all English speaking readers.

Move "Scamper" Into A Separate Article.

I agree with this comment left by ?

...

However the U.S.A. and Hollywood has officially changed the film name to "Scamper". I bet Hollywood has even destroyed the U.K. English Dub, forcing everybody to either watch the Scamper drivel or to learn another language. Sadly, Scamper is enjoyed by millions of people. Even more depressing is the fact that Scamper is 110000000000000000000000000000% more notable than Lolo. I can barely find any existence of Lolo. Yes. Hollywood is THAT powerful.

Lolo is available in Russian, Japanese, English, and at least one other language.

Scamper is available in English and I am not sure about other languages.

Just because the footage is the same, the two films ARE different because Scamper changed the entire production design and diluted the story (deleting half of the original story's CONCLUSION!)

They NEED separate articles. Due to the availability of Lolo in at least four languages, there has to be a large audience somewhere in the world and they would enjoy an official Lolo article.

I cannot read these other languages. This means that if there are approved websites out there that can establish notability for an official Lolo article, I would not be able to read those websites because they would be in a different language that I have not yet learned.

Even more so, I don't think Wiki would even consider considering thinking about considering approving two articles, or changing the name of this one.

We are probably stuck with Scamper.

In Correct (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Names and Censorship

The U.S. version of the film changed all the characters' names, most notably Scamper, who is known as Lolo in the UK, and to speakers of other languages.

The U.S. version also featured censorship due to the original film's very violent nature. The film was censored for the sake of the younger audience of the U.S. culture, and to the parents' satisfaction. This should be mentioned along side the written Summary which is based on the U.S. version. Otherwise, the Summary must be written in a way to make it mutual for everyone, and the censors mentioned in another part. Hope(N Forever) 10:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is an English dub of the ORIGINAL version?!

or am I going to have to learn Russian (or whatever language that is) ? In-Correct (talk) 06:38, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]