Talk:Malvales: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
{{WikiProject Plants|class=start|importance=high}} |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Plants|class=|importance=}} |
{{WikiProject Plants|class=start|importance=high}} |
||
See lengthy discussion under [[Talk:Malvaceae]] with regard to Malvaceae s.l. vs. Tiliaceae, Bombacaceae, and Sterculiaceae. [[User:MrDarwin|MrDarwin]] 14:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
See lengthy discussion under [[Talk:Malvaceae]] with regard to Malvaceae s.l. vs. Tiliaceae, Bombacaceae, and Sterculiaceae. [[User:MrDarwin|MrDarwin]] 14:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:52, 5 May 2013
Plants Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
See lengthy discussion under Talk:Malvaceae with regard to Malvaceae s.l. vs. Tiliaceae, Bombacaceae, and Sterculiaceae. MrDarwin 14:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Addendum
As a rather late addendum to the circumscription issues, I just got a copy of the new "Flowering Plant Families of the World" by Heywood et al. They maintain Malvaceae in a strict sense, but only by splitting the "core Malvales" rather finely into a series of smaller and narrowly defined families (Bombacaceae, Byttneriaceae, Brownlowiaceae, Durionaceae, Helicteraceae, Malvaceae, Pentapetaceae, Sparrmanniaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Tiliaceae); while the "traditional" core Malvalean families are recognized, they are defined by Heywood et al. much more narrowly than in traditional classifications. MrDarwin 16:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)