User talk:Tolly4bolly: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 97.104.34.94 - "→http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Distributed?diff=553798351: new section" |
→Western Canon page return message: new section |
||
Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
You undid an edit on a questionable description of this company. The phrase "ethically questionable" has no factual basis. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/ethical defines ethical as "relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong" and "morally right". As both of these statements rely on the definition of "moral" http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/moral_1?q=moral defines "moral" as "relating to the standards of good or bad behaviour, fairness, honesty, etc. that each person believes in, rather than to laws" and "behaving in ways considered by most people to be correct and honest" - both of these definitions are subjective. Including a subjective descriptor in a factual way is intellectual dishonesty. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/97.104.34.94|97.104.34.94]] ([[User talk:97.104.34.94|talk]]) 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
You undid an edit on a questionable description of this company. The phrase "ethically questionable" has no factual basis. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/ethical defines ethical as "relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong" and "morally right". As both of these statements rely on the definition of "moral" http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/moral_1?q=moral defines "moral" as "relating to the standards of good or bad behaviour, fairness, honesty, etc. that each person believes in, rather than to laws" and "behaving in ways considered by most people to be correct and honest" - both of these definitions are subjective. Including a subjective descriptor in a factual way is intellectual dishonesty. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/97.104.34.94|97.104.34.94]] ([[User talk:97.104.34.94|talk]]) 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Western Canon page return message == |
|||
hi, i apologize as i accidentally removed the information and was simply viewing the page for reading reference, and went to add information to another page being created yet didnt change the window tab and thought i was in my page yet was still in the Wester Canon page. Sorry about that. |
Revision as of 16:23, 8 May 2013
Menu
| |
---|---|
Thanks for taking time to visit this page. |
Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message.
If I have left a message on your talk page, you can reply where you prefer best. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the watch tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist. |
This is Tolly4bolly's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
Template:Archive box collapsible
Screens count of a Bollywood film’s release needed.
Every Bollywood films should have information of screen count when it is releasing.So I added Rowdy rathore screen count.Its not a vandalism.Not even think about it. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gunaah (1993 film), Torreslfchero!
Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Good reviewed.
To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm FrankDev. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jilla(2013 film), and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, FrankDev
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Danrok. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, India-Ethiopia relations, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Danrok
change in my profile
i changed an adress in my profile form current to new one (edit) petarbasic1@gmail.com since i don't use that one any more
thx
59.90.186.230 would like to know why you reverted my edits on the ashtachamma page ?
would like to know why have you reverted my edits on the ashtachamma page ? the page points to a board game site where you can play the game with your facebook friends. i can change the description and put a new one if you suggest , or is it not allowed to put such links. please let me know . the site is clean and not a malware you can see and try it for yourself. Thanks,
Reverted change to Oy Vey
You reverted my change to the Oy Vey article after I conferred with one of my Jewish/hispanic coleagues and she confirmed it.
Your uneducated and moronic edit
What kind of idiot are you to ruin a good article on Jays' Treaty? Someone took the time and effort to write an accurate account of the issues between the US and Britain, and their resolutions and you decided on being a complete moron and ruined it.
The remove RottenTomatoes as well. Reply to TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom
TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom
If you don't know, that that dosent mean that a site dosent exist.
If you apply the same rule you can remove 'rottentomatoes.com' as well, they also """attempting leech off the value of other sites""" as per your remark (ie reviews from various sites) Will you do that? Can you do that?
There has to be a common benchmark.
When did Wikipedia turn unfair and biased?
I have always come across good people in wiki.
Content Deletion
Hi, I am a new user to Wikipedia and I have just updated couple of pages. I am adding a content which is totally related to pages I have updated. E.g. I tried to add main hoon na movie songs link for Wikipedia users. Dont you think users will be benefited by this? I can see other websites links like bollywoodhungama.com, they have added related content on wikipedia. and I am just trying to do the same. I am not doing any kinda promotion or something but trying to help Wikipedia users to get more information about it. So could you please let me know what is the best possible way to link websites which are related to contents?
Regards Zara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zara Verma (talk • contribs) 08:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- First of all welcome here. Secondly, you added spam links here (advertising lyrics website) and adding links are not appropriate here. If you continue add those spam links then you will be blocked (most likely indefinitely). Read what is spam and external links to know what is appropriate here. Thanks. Tolly4bolly 09:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Curious about similar content you just deleted from my page
Hi Tolly,
You have just mentioned that the link i am adding is spam. could you check out this page link here and tell me is it valid or spam?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_of_Bollywood
At the bottom of this page in external links section there is a website called http://www.hindisongs.com.bd/ . and i don't think so its related to page content. and another links in external links section named Bollywood Complete Songs List and Bollywood Video and Audio Songs both are dead link which is not helpful to users.
Its misguiding users as well Zara Verma (talk) 09:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that. They are spam links since they are advertising those sites. I've removed those links from the article. There are some editors who just add spam links to all the articles and those links stay quite long before getting removed and the same happened on that article. Tolly4bolly 09:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
User talk:164.104.135.92
Hi Tolly4bolly,
I just wanted to let you know that an IP address you recently dealth with continued to vandalize. I gave a warning in addition to yours on: User talk:164.104.135.92. Just letting you know. Thanks.
Sosthenes12 (talk) 19:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12
- Thanks. Btw, you don't need to inform me (or other editors) when you warn users. Good luck on fighting with vandalism. Tolly4bolly 19:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Indian Premier League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Smith and Rahul Sharma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Emily Jones
Hello,
I understand your concern with keeping Emily Jones page correct, but she made it very clear Wednesday May 1 on TheTicket in Dallas, that she didn't like to sit in urine left on the toilet seat. Well over 2 million people heard her make this claim and should be left on her wikipedia page for documentation. Please add it back.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.187.100.196 (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi there, since it's a BLP article your edit is considered, we can't add any unsourced/trivia materials to articles. If you add it back it will likely be removed again and your IP address will likely be blocked if you continue vandalising wikipedia with adding unsourced materials to BLP articles. Tolly4bolly 20:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Please add it back. It is clearly source/referenced hear. http://www.theunticket.com/emily-jones-with-hardline-bathroom-talk/ listen for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.187.100.196 (talk) 21:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Since I'm not so familiar with the subject, I think you should discuss with other contributors on the article on their talk page or on article's talk page. If they believe it's appropriate then you can add that. Good luck. Tolly4bolly 21:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Notifications box replacement prototypes released
Hey Tolly4bolly; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
You undid an edit on a questionable description of this company. The phrase "ethically questionable" has no factual basis. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/ethical defines ethical as "relating to beliefs about what is morally right and wrong" and "morally right". As both of these statements rely on the definition of "moral" http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/moral_1?q=moral defines "moral" as "relating to the standards of good or bad behaviour, fairness, honesty, etc. that each person believes in, rather than to laws" and "behaving in ways considered by most people to be correct and honest" - both of these definitions are subjective. Including a subjective descriptor in a factual way is intellectual dishonesty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.104.34.94 (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Western Canon page return message
hi, i apologize as i accidentally removed the information and was simply viewing the page for reading reference, and went to add information to another page being created yet didnt change the window tab and thought i was in my page yet was still in the Wester Canon page. Sorry about that.