Talk:Jarmann M1884: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:42, 28 May 2006

Template:Featured article is only for Wikipedia:Featured articles. Template:Mainpage date

Jarmann M1884 received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry FA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

FA

This article has been rated as FA-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

There is a request, submitted by WegianWarrior, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Would love to see all featured articles as spoken.".

enfilading

It should be clarified as to what "438 m Enfilading" means. I know it says "(the path of the bullet would pass through a man-sized target)", but i'm not sure what the distance rating refers to. Fresheneesz 02:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also in that table, it mentions a "rate of fire" but no units. What does "8" rate of fire mean? Is that 8 shots per minute? Fresheneesz 02:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Front page clarification

The blurb on the Wikipedia main page says that the rifle used black powder cartridges, and that it turned the Norwegian army into one armed with weapons that used smokeless powder. Smokeless powder is, of course, the modern replacement of black powder and the two are not the same. The article itself explains this later on, but the front page (and probably the beginning of the article, which I have not yet read closely) could use some clarification. I originally clicked through to make a correction to the article, but saw that the explanation is there - it could just use better placement. 68.230.214.218 03:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

first rifle design or first breech loading rifle ?

Jacob Smitch Jarmann designed his first rifle breech-loading rifle firing cardboard cartridges—in 1838,[ Unclear which is intended with the repeated reference to 'rifle' pmh 05:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smitch or Smith

variation in text pmh 05:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new = unique

redundancy in text ? pmh 05:34, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

combat sight

"This combat sight was graduated to 430 m (470 yd), since the path taken by the bullet did not rise over 1,80 meter (6 ft) at this distance." It is unclear why or how the conditional statement is related to the combat sight. pmh 05:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

excitable ?

"The combination of tubular magazine and centerfire ammunition has been referred to as too excitable, especially when used with pointed bullets." Unclear as to the meaning of 'too excitable'. Is there an 'excitable' quality in a rifle or its use that can be excessive? pmh 05:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 "This combat sight was graduated to 430 m (470 yd), since the path taken by the bullet did not rise over 1,80 meter (6 ft) at this distance." It is unclear why or how the conditional statement is related to the combat sight. [[User:Howellpm|pmh]] 05:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
+== excitable ? ==
+"The combination of tubular magazine and centerfire ammunition has been referred to as too excitable, especially when used with pointed bullets." Unclear as to the meaning of 'too excitable'. Is there an 'excitable' quality in a rifle or its use that can be excessive? [[User:Howellpm|pmh]] 05:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)