Jump to content

Talk:Mahavatar Babaji: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Kgm.amogh - "Mahavatar Babaji Nagraj: new section"
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs)
m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 90d) to Talk:Mahavatar Babaji/Archive 1, Talk:Mahavatar Babaji/Archive 2.
Line 21: Line 21:
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 80K
|maxarchivesize = 80K
|counter = 1
|counter = 2
|algo = old(90d)
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Mahavatar Babaji/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Mahavatar Babaji/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}


== Mistaken identity?==
== Identity ==
I think the paragraph about Haidakhan Babaji being mistakenly identified as Babaji should be re-written to a NPOV. I have a copy of Babaji: Gateway to the Light by Gertraud Reichel Verlag in which she tells about many people coming and asking Haidakhan Babaji directly if he was the same Babaji from Yogananda's Autobiography and he says yes.[[User:Yonderboy|Yonderboy]] 02:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
:Another work would seem to confirm that, Babaji The Divine Himalayan Yogi, by Swami S. Giri--[[Special:Contributions/71.55.208.16|71.55.208.16]] ([[User talk:71.55.208.16|talk]]) 01:25, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


==Mataji==
[[Mataji]] [[:de:Mataji|Mataji]]
[[:ind:Matachi|Matachi]]
[[User:88.72.2.161|88.72.2.161]] 19:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

==Identity==
This debate is absurd. The whole point is to realize that Babaji is God and EVERYONE and EVERYTHING is God. EVERYONE IS BABAJI. When all of these different saints are saying they are Babaji, there is no contradiction. If they all were together in one room, they would not argue, "I am Babaji" - "No, I am!" It would go "I am Babaji," - "Yes, I am too." Namaste[[User:Yonderboy|Yonderboy]] 19:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
This debate is absurd. The whole point is to realize that Babaji is God and EVERYONE and EVERYTHING is God. EVERYONE IS BABAJI. When all of these different saints are saying they are Babaji, there is no contradiction. If they all were together in one room, they would not argue, "I am Babaji" - "No, I am!" It would go "I am Babaji," - "Yes, I am too." Namaste[[User:Yonderboy|Yonderboy]] 19:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


:That is very true! In the deepest sense, there is no contradictions whatsoever! --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
:That is very true! In the deepest sense, there is no contradictions whatsoever! --<font style="background:gold">[[WP:ESP|<font color="green">S</font>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</font><sup><font style="background:yellow">[[User talk:Siva1979|Talk to me]]</font></sup> 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


==279==
== 279 ==

Indeed I am Babaji is the correct statement despite whomsoever in this manifest form makes it. However it must be noted that the active element of the ego must have disappeared to confine the notion of 'I' to its true state, that is, the I in everyone. If stated with ego acting, this aspect of 'I' is ego, is false. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vishal279|Vishal279]] ([[User talk:Vishal279|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vishal279|contribs]]) 03:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Indeed I am Babaji is the correct statement despite whomsoever in this manifest form makes it. However it must be noted that the active element of the ego must have disappeared to confine the notion of 'I' to its true state, that is, the I in everyone. If stated with ego acting, this aspect of 'I' is ego, is false. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Vishal279|Vishal279]] ([[User talk:Vishal279|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vishal279|contribs]]) 03:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==For name==
== For name ==

Mahavatar Babaji is not a name in the meaning of the place of incarnation of great father. Will you change the name to Mahavatar Babaji Nagaraj or Babaji Nagaraj? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/160.26.2.2|160.26.2.2]] ([[User talk:160.26.2.2|talk]]) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Mahavatar Babaji is not a name in the meaning of the place of incarnation of great father. Will you change the name to Mahavatar Babaji Nagaraj or Babaji Nagaraj? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/160.26.2.2|160.26.2.2]] ([[User talk:160.26.2.2|talk]]) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->



Revision as of 02:39, 27 May 2013

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.


Identity

This debate is absurd. The whole point is to realize that Babaji is God and EVERYONE and EVERYTHING is God. EVERYONE IS BABAJI. When all of these different saints are saying they are Babaji, there is no contradiction. If they all were together in one room, they would not argue, "I am Babaji" - "No, I am!" It would go "I am Babaji," - "Yes, I am too." NamasteYonderboy 19:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is very true! In the deepest sense, there is no contradictions whatsoever! --Siva1979Talk to me 09:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

279

Indeed I am Babaji is the correct statement despite whomsoever in this manifest form makes it. However it must be noted that the active element of the ego must have disappeared to confine the notion of 'I' to its true state, that is, the I in everyone. If stated with ego acting, this aspect of 'I' is ego, is false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishal279 (talkcontribs) 03:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For name

Mahavatar Babaji is not a name in the meaning of the place of incarnation of great father. Will you change the name to Mahavatar Babaji Nagaraj or Babaji Nagaraj? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.26.2.2 (talk) 23:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

harik

'I'is not the only means of an ego in Hinduism.For an enlightened masters or Prophets it mean of His invisible self or immortality self.self is awareness of mind in physical form and another means by self as awareness in super conscious state of cosmic intelligence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.133.168.230 (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

iUniverse sources

I'm not sure when these sources were introduced, but iUniverse books are self-published. The listed author, "Yoga Nikitan", does not appear to be a recognized published authority. These sources are not reliable and need to be removed. Any comments or feedback before I do so? Yworo (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mahavatar Babaji Nagraj

With the most uptodate authentic first hand experience reveleations about this great Yogi by living yogi Sri M in his autobiography " Apprenticed to Himalayan Master-Autobiograhy of a Yogi".There are atleast 3 occassions Sri M had direct experience with Babaji narrated in his book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgm.amogh (talkcontribs) 06:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]