Jump to content

User talk:Love Robin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Love Robin (talk | contribs)
Line 32: Line 32:
:I ask that you remove the banner. I ask as a courtesy as I'm quite willing to involve an admin in this. I say this as I can't see anything which says ''you'' are one. You were directly asked on your Talk page if you were, I see no response.
:I ask that you remove the banner. I ask as a courtesy as I'm quite willing to involve an admin in this. I say this as I can't see anything which says ''you'' are one. You were directly asked on your Talk page if you were, I see no response.
:Also, I requested you to discuss this on the article's Talk page, which is where contributing editors would be easiest involved. —[[User:Love Robin|Love Robin]] ([[User talk:Love Robin#top|talk]]) 18:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
:Also, I requested you to discuss this on the article's Talk page, which is where contributing editors would be easiest involved. —[[User:Love Robin|Love Robin]] ([[User talk:Love Robin#top|talk]]) 18:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
:: While I'm not an admin, I'm not aware of any rule that says only admins can tag articles for cleanup. But since I don't feel that strongly about ''Kim Possible'', I've taken off the {{tlx|primary sources}} tag. I still think it falls under {{tlx|in-universe}}, though. [[User:Trivialist|Trivialist]] ([[User talk:Trivialist|talk]]) 21:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:33, 28 May 2013

Talk to me…

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kim Possible characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ego and Warmonger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Kim Possible characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CHU

Do you mean you'll accept User:Love Robin or User:LoveRobin? Right now you're actually requesting the name User:Love Robin (with or without the space) which is an odd and very long name (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:27, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is what I am requestiong, the "(with or without space)" is not meant to be part of the Requested New Name, and the preferences are as you've listed, with-space first, please. Should I edit the request section? — ZigZagStudios (talk) 22:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course fix it. Chose one. Edit it now (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thank You. — ZigZagStudios (talk) 23:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation

I confirm that this account has requested User:Love robin as a doppelganger account. Love Robin (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kim Possible characters

The article info may be correct, but most of the references are from the show itself, which is a primary source for Wikipedia's purposes. Trivialist (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that primary source is for Real World issues and fails when applied to things such as recreational TV shows such as Kim Possible. There is a discussion about that somewhere I stumbled across before but do not have the time to find again. The upshot was that for some matters the *spirit* of the WP rules should be followed more so than the *word* of them.
Thing is, for a subject like Kim Possible's characters, the show is the ONLY proper source. There are NO secondary sources which can provide accurate information. IMDB is tapped for many of the more obscure VA info, but IMDB is considered an unreliable source due to its open-edit nature. Could go to a variety of other KP related websites and wikias, but what you'll find is the same information repeated verbatim (even if a little outdated) from this very article, which likewise makes them unreliable.
I ask that you remove the banner. I ask as a courtesy as I'm quite willing to involve an admin in this. I say this as I can't see anything which says you are one. You were directly asked on your Talk page if you were, I see no response.
Also, I requested you to discuss this on the article's Talk page, which is where contributing editors would be easiest involved. —Love Robin (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
While I'm not an admin, I'm not aware of any rule that says only admins can tag articles for cleanup. But since I don't feel that strongly about Kim Possible, I've taken off the {{primary sources}} tag. I still think it falls under {{in-universe}}, though. Trivialist (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]