User talk:204.9.11.123: Difference between revisions
test1a |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the [[WP:ES|edit summary]] or on the article's [[WP:TP|talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test1a (First level warning) --> [[User:RexNL|RexNL]] 02:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the [[WP:ES|edit summary]] or on the article's [[WP:TP|talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test1a (First level warning) --> [[User:RexNL|RexNL]] 02:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
I've removed the information you added to [[Richard_III_of_England]] and [[Shrek]] linking the two. I don't see any supporting information (as I requested on the discussion pages), and the statements were NPOV. If this information is accurate, please find a way to phrase following the NPOV rule and provide supporting information on a dicussion page. [[User:Romalar|Romalar]] 03:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:42, 30 May 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia. You might want to consider creating an account. You've added quite a lot of material to Richard III of England, some of which is a bit controversial. Please cite your sources (see WP:CITE). Other editors cannot judge the information you've included unless you tell us where we can check it. Thank you. Chick Bowen 15:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Further to the above, I have to warn you that as long as you keep adding irrelevant material to the Richard III article, I will keep removing it. Deb 12:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Dear Anon, Please ensure that any amendments you make to controversial articles such as Richard III of England follow the NPOV rule and are relevant to the article in question. I have just had to rollback another group of edits from you, and the trouble with this is that the baby gets thrown out with the bathwater, ie. good edits you may have made will be lost when your contribution is reverted. Deb 11:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 02:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I've removed the information you added to Richard_III_of_England and Shrek linking the two. I don't see any supporting information (as I requested on the discussion pages), and the statements were NPOV. If this information is accurate, please find a way to phrase following the NPOV rule and provide supporting information on a dicussion page. Romalar 03:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)