Talk:Sd.Kfz. 251: Difference between revisions
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
== Hanomag == |
== Hanomag == |
||
I've never once heard them called this in the context of the Allies. Does anyone else have more corroborating evidence? |
I've never once heard them called this in the context of the Allies. Does anyone else have more corroborating evidence? comment added by --[[User:Kriegaffe|Kriegaffe]] ([[User talk:Kriegaffe|talk]]) 19:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:16, 11 June 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sd.Kfz. 251 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Germany Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War II Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Cultural Impact?
This whole section seems a bit weak to me. Is it needed? --Jolyonralph 20:58, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
- You're right, and no it doesn't and now isn't.GraemeLeggett 16:09, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
Bibliography?
The article seems good, although IMHO it lacks "written" references. Will tag accordingly, and try to add some myself. Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- I've just added two useful little books from "Osprey" and "Squadron/Signal", but as I'd like to see more (and better) references will leave the tag for a while. Regards, DPdH (talk) 08:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Name changes
The article doesn't seem to mention the 'mittlere' (medium) prefix except for the /22 and /23. The correct name, according to D 97/1+ (Gerätliste vom 1. 7. 43 from 1943-07-01) would include 'mittlere' for all the variants (e.g. mittlerer Schützenpanzerwagen (Sd Kfz 251/1) - and yes, there shouldn't be any periods in the abbreviation either). Unless there is a better reference for the current names, I'll change them. Christian Ankerstjerne (talk) 12:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Ausf D
From early 1943, the Ausf D variant was developed with a purpose of reducing the number of angled body plates down to 50%, simplifying the design and thus speeding up the production. - is there a contemporary German source for this? If they reduced the number of angled plates by 50%, why did the weight go up 200kgs? Koakhtzvigad (talk) 13:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Users
Weren't these used post-War by Czechoslovakia and Israel?
- I think the Czechoslovakians used their own version called the OT-810. It was more or less the same as the Sd.Kfz. 251 but had a larger engine and some modifications to the body. --Kriegaffe (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hanomag
I've never once heard them called this in the context of the Allies. Does anyone else have more corroborating evidence? comment added by --Kriegaffe (talk) 19:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military land vehicles articles
- Military land vehicles task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles