Jump to content

User talk:24.61.9.111: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Blocked: clarify
sticky sticky
Line 1: Line 1:
{{dynamicip|a Comcast Cable subscriber in Cambridge, Massachusetts}}
{dynamic| , likely a [[Sticky_dynamic_IP#Sticky_dynamic_IP_address|sticky dynamic IP]] attached to a school served by Comcast Cable in Cambridge, Massachusetts}}


== Welcome ==
== Welcome ==

Revision as of 00:30, 14 June 2013

{dynamic| , likely a sticky dynamic IP attached to a school served by Comcast Cable in Cambridge, Massachusetts}}

Welcome

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200


Hello, 24.61.9.111, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am MBisanz and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

  Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help
  Tips
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...
  Be Bold
  Assume Good faith
23   Keep cool
  Have an experienced editor adopt you
  Policy on neutral point of view

And here are several pages on what to avoid:

How to not spam
How to avoid copyright infringement
What Wikipedia is not
Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the button; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might want to join the the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your first experiences here; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome! 


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Click here to reply to this message.

This welcome message was sent by MBisanz at 03:32, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.61.9.111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Basket of Pupies. I am an anonymous editor and do not have an account. Please unblock me as I am not Basket.

Decline reason:

I have reviewed this ip's contribution history. It has only made five edits to the encyclopedia, two of which were useful, and two of which appear to be vandalism. All the other edits are to Wikipedia administrative pages, many of them wildly inappropriate and far from useful. I don't see evidence that unblocking this ip would be likely to lead to significant improvements in the encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:54, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.61.9.111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here to edit Gangnam Style. Why do you block me? 24.61.9.111 (talk) 16:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a valid unblock request, and I agree with Fram - this IP certainly isn't being used in a constructive manner. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:56, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly Advice

Hello there, I wandered in from your ANI thread and would like to offer the following advice: You are playing very hot poker right now. On the one hand your extreme familiarity with certain parts of the WP (Rules/Guidelines/Best Practices) suggests that you have a significant proficency with Wiki-speak to the point that a reasonable request for you to disclose any previous accounts you may have edited under. Your repeated haranging on very minute points of WikiLaw is to the point that you are causing more disruption by calling for administrators to be stripped of their advanced permissions on technical violations. I say this with all respect, but it is in your interest to not cause any further disruption as you now have 2 threads where a segment of the community has told you to sit down and be quiet. I suggest you take the advice. Hasteur (talk) 19:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The "community" is not represented by those who hang out at WP:ANI. 24.61.9.111 (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 23:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.61.9.111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not now nor have I ever had a Wikipedia account. I am not evading any block as I have never previous been blocked. This block is improper, arbitrary, punitive, and capricious. 24.61.9.111 (talk) 23:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As others have mentioned above, I do not believe you are here to build an encyclopedia. SQLQuery me! 15:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nope!

Still not caught me! Gosh, you all are REALLY bad at proxies and spoofing! 63.92.228.217 (talk) 01:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 year as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Bearian (talk) 16:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.61.9.111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocking an IP for one year is punitive and way beyond what policy allows. 24.61.9.111 (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No it isn't. Granted, going from two weeks to a year is a big step, but that's within administrative discretion. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.61.9.111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Punitive in every way. Are you sure you want to block a dynamically assigned IP address for a full year? Absurd. 24.61.9.111 (talk) 23:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As Daniel noted, you're very wrong. You've shown no indication that upon release of a block of any length that the disruption will cease, so one would argue that a longer block is far more effective - even longer than one year.

Given your ample opportunity to convince administrators that your disruption will not continue, but you have in no way done so, I am revoking talk page privileges - especially since you keep repeating the same argument for your unblocking and continuing to waste administrators' time. Toddst1 (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.61.9.111&oldid=559801122"