Wikipedia:Peer review/Whaam!/archive1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:42, 15 June 2013

Whaam!

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because it is my second attempt to prepare one of Roy Lichtenstein's most important works for a September 28th 50th anniversary of its first exhibition. Unfortunately, with Drowning Girl while cleaning it up I found that it had also exhibited in April 1963. Thus, we need another work for the 50th anniversary. This is Lichtenstein's most important work, making it a good choice for the effort.

Thanks, TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any c/e quibbles I have I can look after myself. As a very broad comment, I think your not seeing the wood for the trees, and this might be reflective of the sources your choosing. I added this [1] context, and this is what I'd like to see more of in your Lichtenstein articles; art historical context, and some understanding for the reader at what the man was trying to express. Im very hopeful for this article that said; keep on going. Ceoil (talk) 08:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:40, 15 June 2013 edit Ceoil (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers 171,993 edits r ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:42, 15 June 2013 edit undo Ceoil (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers 171,993 edits sp. Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Thanks, [[User:TonyTheTiger\|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger\|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger\|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon\|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 02:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)		Thanks, [[User:TonyTheTiger\|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger\|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger\|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon\|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 02:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

	:Any c/e quibbles I have I can look after myself. As a very ~~braod~~ comment, I think your not seeing the wood for the trees, and this might be reflective of the sources your choosing. I added this [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Whaam!&diff=prev&oldid=559989421] context, and this is what I'd like to see more of in your Lichtenstein articles; art historical context, and some understanding for the reader at what the man was trying to express. Im very hopeful for this article that said; keep on going. [[User:Ceoil\|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil\|talk]]) 08:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)		:Any c/e quibbles I have I can look after myself. As a very broad comment, I think your not seeing the wood for the trees, and this might be reflective of the sources your choosing. I added this [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Whaam!&diff=prev&oldid=559989421] context, and this is what I'd like to see more of in your Lichtenstein articles; art historical context, and some understanding for the reader at what the man was trying to express. Im very hopeful for this article that said; keep on going. [[User:Ceoil\|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil\|talk]]) 08:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)