Talk:2013 Wuxi Classic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:57, 24 June 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Snooker Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Snooker, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of snooker on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SnookerWikipedia:WikiProject SnookerTemplate:WikiProject SnookerSnooker
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mark Selby

Noticing that Mark Selby lost in qualifying, I wonder, is this the first time that a reigning world number 1 has lost in qualifying and not either been at the venue stage of a ranking event or been in the last 64 depsite entering and trying to be there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.254.2 (talk) 23:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, however without a reliable source it can't be added to the article, as that would be original research. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did Reanne Evans get £3000?

When the prize fund says "last 64" does this mean that those chosen for the wildcard round that lost didn't get anything - or does losing to the wildcard still count as last 64 for those purposes?

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Noticing that Mark Selby lost in qualifying, I wonder, is this the first time that a reigning world number 1 has lost in qualifying and not either been at the venue stage of a ranking event or been in the last 64 depsite entering and trying to be there?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/157.203.254.2|157.203.254.2]] ([[User talk:157.203.254.2|talk]]) 23:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :That may be true, however without a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] it can't be added to the article, as that would be [[WP:OR|original research]]. [[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]] <sup>[[User talk:Armbrust|<font color="#E3A857">The</font> <font color="#008000">Homunculus</font>]]</sup> 03:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
+== Did Reanne Evans get £3000? ==
+When the prize fund says "last 64" does this mean that those chosen for the wildcard round that lost didn't get anything - or does losing to the wildcard still count as last 64 for those purposes?