Jump to content

User talk:83.77.253.211: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:




***We have opened a discussion on the talk page*** [[Talk:Repertoire_of_Plácido_Domingo#Intro_sentence]] which you are invited to read and to which you are welcome to contribute. Thanks in advance for your open-minded support.[[Special:Contributions/83.77.253.211|83.77.253.211]] ([[User talk:83.77.253.211|talk]]) 10:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
:::'''We have opened a discussion on the talk page''' [[Talk:Repertoire_of_Plácido_Domingo#Intro_sentence]] which you are invited to read and to which you are welcome to contribute. Thanks in advance for your open-minded support.[[Special:Contributions/83.77.253.211|83.77.253.211]] ([[User talk:83.77.253.211|talk]]) 10:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:41, 29 June 2013

June 2013

Hello, I'm Yintan. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Repertoire of Plácido Domingo seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Yinta 22:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: you now have two editors who have reverted your inclusion of an opinion for which you are unable to provide a reliable source, other than your own.
Please read neutral point of view and do not change the article unless you can find substantiation. Under the three-revert rule of Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Edit warring), any reverting by you may be considered grounds obtaining a block on your editing.
You are advised to discuss this issue here or on the article's talk page before taking any further action. Please read the rules of Wikipedia. Viva-Verdi (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The original version (see 555158083) of the intro was: "Perhaps the most versatile of all living tenors," which was very neutral and no POV. The very fact of offering a list of 142 roles is by itself a reason to allow this intro, IMMO. The text says "perhaps", so it's still objective. Proposal: let's return to the original formulation which was there for a couple of years! 83.77.253.211 (talk) 09:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NB: There are now three editors who have opposed your wording and have made reverts. I agree with the removal of the link to the Met by User talk:Michael Bednarek, which is simply a long list of singers and their performances and which in no way supports the POV statement (with its variations) that you have continued to make. Viva-Verdi (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


We have opened a discussion on the talk page Talk:Repertoire_of_Plácido_Domingo#Intro_sentence which you are invited to read and to which you are welcome to contribute. Thanks in advance for your open-minded support.83.77.253.211 (talk) 10:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]