Talk:Gaming computer: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 78.169.15.124 - "" |
Assessment: Video games: importance=High (assisted) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Video games|class=C|importance= |
{{WikiProject Video games |class=C |importance=High}} |
||
== Manufacturer list == |
== Manufacturer list == |
Revision as of 20:45, 4 July 2013
Manufacturer list
Wikipedia is not an advertising site for links to every possible manufacturer. See WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. Turgan Talk 19:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- More to the point, this list will eventually devolve into a laundry list. Just about every system builder has some kind of gaming model to offer. Does a list of manufacturers provide any useful information about the subject? I doubt it, and in the meantime it will continue to be a spam magnet. I suggest removal and will wait a bit for comments. Ham Pastrami (talk) 08:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Since there have been no objections or explanations as to the list's relevance, I am proceeding with removal. Ham Pastrami (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
What the hell is this?
"One thing to keep in mind however, is do not get an extremely powerful graphics card that your CPU can barely handle. Getting a slightly lower-end graphics card and an excellent CPU will allow for near-perfect gameplay and room for upgrading in the future."
I bet it's written by someone working in INTEL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.169.15.124 (talk) 03:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)