Revision as of 21:16, 5 July 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Gs814, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as One America News Network, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JetBlast (talk) 21:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One America News Network

The article One America News Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not really notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JetBlast (talk) 21:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

advice=

Welcome to Wikipedia . We're always glad to have articles on notable new subjects. But the rules are that an article on an organization needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not press releases, or material derived from press releases. For One America News Network , if you have such sources, it may be possible to rewrite the article; otherwise, it will not be possible until such sources are published.

As you expand the article, remember that a Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do Don't include material that would better belong in an advertisement or a web page, such as a detailed list of products or of executives or branch offices.Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM (permission that irrevocably gives everyone in the world the right to copy, reuse, and modify the material) , the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.)

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients/purchasers/students/supporters/donors--that sort of content is considered promotional.

As reviewing administrator, I removed the prod tag and placed an "underconstruction" tag on the article which should give you a few days to find sources before it gets listed for deletion. If you find you can't do it yet you can facilitate matters by placing at the top a line reading : {{db-author}}, and it will be quickly deleted.. When you have the necessary material, then try again. I do not want to discourage you, but to encourage you to continue to contribute. DGG ( talk ) 21:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:JetBlast|JetBlast]] ([[User talk:JetBlast|talk]]) 21:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
+=advice==
+Welcome to Wikipedia . We're always glad to have articles on notable new subjects. But the rules are that an article on an organization  needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, ''but not press releases, or material derived from press releases.'' For [[:One America News Network ]],  if you have such sources, it may be possible to rewrite the article; otherwise,  it will not be possible until such sources are published.
+As you expand the article, remember that a Wikipedia article  needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do Don't include material that would better belong in an advertisement or a web page, such as a detailed list of products or of executives or branch offices.Remember not to  copy from a web site, even your own -- ''first'' it's a copyright violation, but, ''even'' if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to [[WP:DCM]] (permission that irrevocably gives everyone in the world the right to copy, reuse, and modify the material) , the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.)
+Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients/purchasers/students/supporters/donors--that sort of content is considered promotional.
+As reviewing administrator,  I removed the prod tag and placed an "underconstruction" tag on the article which should give you a few days to find sources before it gets listed for deletion. If you find you can't do it yet   you can facilitate matters by placing at the top a line reading : <nowiki>{{db-author}}</nowiki>, and it will be quickly deleted.. When you have the necessary material, then try again.    I do not want to discourage you, but to encourage you to continue to contribute. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 21:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)