Talk:FC Midtjylland: Difference between revisions
Assessing importance on WP:FOOTBALL |
m Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWB (9359) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Denmark|class=Stub|importance=}} |
{{WikiProject Denmark|class=Stub|importance=}} |
||
{{Football|class=Stub|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Football|class=Stub|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Superleague Formula}} |
{{WikiProject Superleague Formula}} |
||
}} |
|||
==Fair use rationale for Image:FC Midtjylland.png== |
==Fair use rationale for Image:FC Midtjylland.png== |
Revision as of 00:38, 18 July 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Fair use rationale for Image:FC Midtjylland.png
Image:FC Midtjylland.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
NPOV
Is it just me or does this page read more like a fanzine than an encyclopedic entry? Paulmallon (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. I'll have a look at the history over the next few days. Leaving it be isn't an endorsement of the current version, but to change it without knowing what we're talking about would be original research, which is no better. 82.5.72.161 (talk) 15:53, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Edú Latoche
Please make sure he doesn't get written into the squad. I don't know if anyone by the name exists, but I know that he doesn't play for FCM, and shouldn't be added. Is it possible to make it a bannable offense writing him in, as it's some sort of vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.211.1.20 (talk) 08:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Former players
Looks like a list of random former players. Sule never played for FCM (for Herning, not FCM) Gjosevski played one match Agbetu played 9 matches (i don't know where the fuck that 38 comes from, but he hasn't played 38 matches) Adeshina Lawal and Justice John Erhende never played a single match Traoré and Poku were reserves Dadu was decent, but didn't play a lot of matches because other players were better
Why do they deserve a mention as notable?