Talk:Michio Kaku: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 82.81.205.91 - "→Criticism: " |
MrWorshipMe (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
There are many scientists who strongly criticize Kaku's methods for popularization of science and explaining physics concepts to the layman. Could we make a section about this if enough references are compiled? [[User:Hamsterlopithecus|Hamsterlopithecus]] ([[User talk:Hamsterlopithecus|talk]]) 20:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
There are many scientists who strongly criticize Kaku's methods for popularization of science and explaining physics concepts to the layman. Could we make a section about this if enough references are compiled? [[User:Hamsterlopithecus|Hamsterlopithecus]] ([[User talk:Hamsterlopithecus|talk]]) 20:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
I would gladly provide references to the inaccuracies he spreads, and can even explain the faults of these explanations. but you would have to compile it, as I have no experience in wikipedia. |
I would gladly provide references to the inaccuracies he spreads, and can even explain the faults of these explanations. but you would have to compile it, as I have no experience in wikipedia. |
||
Maybe we could open a different page devoted to fallacies of pop science - and refer to these. |
Maybe we could open a different page devoted to fallacies of pop science - and refer to these. [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MrWorshipMe|MrWorshipMe]] ([[User talk:MrWorshipMe|talk]]) 12:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:48, 19 July 2013
Biography: Science and Academia C‑class | ||||||||||
|
Physics: Biographies C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
20/20
Can anyone recognize the fact that dr.kaku was on 20/20 in the United States on ABC in August 2006 the special was enttitled 7 deadly threats to earth.
The Screensavers
Dr. Kaku has also appeared on The Screensavers a few times (G4/TechTV)
Matters of faith
is he an atheist, anagnostic, deist, or does he associate with a religious identity? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.90.157.166 (talk) 06:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- He's a Presbyterian.
"His own religious influences were contradictory: his parents were Buddhist, but he was raised as a Presbyterian. Yet modern physics seems to accommodate both views." [1]
Seniortrend (talk) 04:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- It just says he was raised Presbyterian; he might not be anymore. At the end of that article it says "Kaku described his belief eloquently: 'I would say that I lean toward the God of Einstein and Spinoza; that is, a God of harmony, simplicity and elegance, rather than a personal God who interferes in human affairs ...'
- That doesn't sound like a Christian god to me. --Jak86 (talk)(contribs)(email) 12:47, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed, that sounds a lot more like the Deist God of the Enlightenment than a Christian God. References to such should probably be in his own words. Again, as this is a biography of a living person, all statements must be reliably sourced.Spirit469 (talk) 06:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- The only 'source' of his Pantheism I was able to find [1] related to the fact that he is the son of Japanese immigrants, "so he probably had some Shinto/Buddhist influences... and he's a scientist. Therefore Pantheism!". I would hope whoever labeled him as this on this page has better sources than the ones I found based on racist stereotype nonsense.Absurdist313 (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Criticism
There are many scientists who strongly criticize Kaku's methods for popularization of science and explaining physics concepts to the layman. Could we make a section about this if enough references are compiled? Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC) I would gladly provide references to the inaccuracies he spreads, and can even explain the faults of these explanations. but you would have to compile it, as I have no experience in wikipedia. Maybe we could open a different page devoted to fallacies of pop science - and refer to these. unsigned comment added by MrWorshipMe (talk) 12:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- High-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class physics articles
- High-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of High-importance
- C-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors