Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacobga: Difference between revisions
Adding new report for The.aviation.expert. (TW) |
Demiurge1000 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
I don't understand why you're opening an SPI on yourself, regarding an account that hasn't edited since 2007. If it's important to you that you acknowledge the existence (years ago) of an earlier account, why not just mention it on your own userpage? Also I don't understand what "however no removal" means. |
|||
Suggest this be closed. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 19:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 19:47, 23 July 2013
Jacobga
Jacobga (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacobga/Archive.
23 July 2013
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Seskadog (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
This is an old account, I did let admins know before I had this account however no removal AviationExpert ✈ (talk) 19:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I don't understand why you're opening an SPI on yourself, regarding an account that hasn't edited since 2007. If it's important to you that you acknowledge the existence (years ago) of an earlier account, why not just mention it on your own userpage? Also I don't understand what "however no removal" means.
Suggest this be closed. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)