Musica enchiriadis: Difference between revisions
m Bot: Migrating 8 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q1370682 (Report Errors) |
Baryphonos (talk | contribs) Corrections re. orthography & matters of fact: Scolica enchiriadis is not a "commentary" on Musica enchiriadis, and it is Scolica, not Musica, that includes a remark concerning different tempos, using the comparative adjectives "celerius" and "morosius." |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Musica enchiriadis''''' is an [[Anonymity|anonymous]] musical [[treatise]] |
'''''Musica enchiriadis''''' is an [[Anonymity|anonymous]] musical [[treatise]] of the 9th century. It is the first surviving attempt to establish a system of rules for [[polyphony]] in [[classical music]]. The treatise was once attributed to [[Hucbald]], but this is no longer accepted. <ref name=hoppin>Hoppin, Richard H. ''Medieval Music''. Norton, 1978, pp.188-193.</ref> Some historians once attributed it to [[Odo of Cluny]] (879-942). <ref name=finney>Finney, Theodore M. A History of Music. Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1935, p. 61</ref> |
||
This [[music theory]] treatise, along with its companion |
This [[music theory]] treatise, along with its companion text, ''[[Scolica enchiriadis]]'', was widely circulated in medieval [[manuscript]]s, often in association with [[Boethius]]' ''[[De Institutione Musica|De institutione musica]]''.<ref name=grove>Erickson, Raymond. "Musica enchiriadis, Scholia enchiriadis". ''The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians''. London: Macmillan, 2001.</ref> It consists of nineteen chapters; the first nine are devoted to [[musical notation|notation]], [[mode (music)|mode]]s, and [[monophony|monophonic]] [[plainchant]].<ref name=grove/> |
||
Chapters 10-18 deal with [[polyphonic music]]. The author shows how [[Consonance and dissonance|consonant]] intervals should be used in order to compose or [[improvisation|improvise]] |
Chapters 10-18 deal with [[polyphonic music]]. The author here shows how [[Consonance and dissonance|consonant]] intervals should be used in order to compose or [[improvisation|improvise]] the type of early-medieval polyphonic music called <ref name=grove/> [[organum]], an early style of note-against-note polyphony several examples of which are included in the treatise.<ref name=grove/> (''Scolica enchiriadis'' also observes that some melodies should be sung sung "more quickly" (''celerius''), others "more slowly" (''morosius'').) The last, nineteenth, chapter of ''Musica enchiriadis'' relates the legend of [[Orpheus]].<ref name=grove/> |
||
[[Image:DasiaNotation2.jpg|thumb|right|400px| The notation used in Musica enchiriadis. The scale comprises four tetrachords. The symbols indicating the notes are rotated and mirrored depending on the tetrachords. A modern transcription of the notes is below.]] |
[[Image:DasiaNotation2.jpg|thumb|right|400px| The notation used in Musica enchiriadis. The scale comprises four tetrachords. The symbols indicating the notes are rotated and mirrored depending on the tetrachords. A modern transcription of the notes is below.]] |
Revision as of 11:23, 26 July 2013
Musica enchiriadis is an anonymous musical treatise of the 9th century. It is the first surviving attempt to establish a system of rules for polyphony in classical music. The treatise was once attributed to Hucbald, but this is no longer accepted. [1] Some historians once attributed it to Odo of Cluny (879-942). [2]
This music theory treatise, along with its companion text, Scolica enchiriadis, was widely circulated in medieval manuscripts, often in association with Boethius' De institutione musica.[3] It consists of nineteen chapters; the first nine are devoted to notation, modes, and monophonic plainchant.[3]
Chapters 10-18 deal with polyphonic music. The author here shows how consonant intervals should be used in order to compose or improvise the type of early-medieval polyphonic music called [3] organum, an early style of note-against-note polyphony several examples of which are included in the treatise.[3] (Scolica enchiriadis also observes that some melodies should be sung sung "more quickly" (celerius), others "more slowly" (morosius).) The last, nineteenth, chapter of Musica enchiriadis relates the legend of Orpheus.[3]
The scale used in the work, which is based on a system of tetrachords, appears to have been created solely for use in the work itself, rather than taken from actual musical practice.[1] The treatise also uses a very rare system of notation, known as Daseian notation. This notation has a number of figures which are rotated ninety degrees to represent different pitches.
A critical edition of the treatises was published in 1981, and an English translation in 1995.[3]