Talk:IGATE: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:31, 13 August 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Actually, better to merge iGATE with iGATE Patni. I am going to do it now because it would create confusion among people who are trying to access iGATE and iGATE Patni. I hope this is approved.Adarsh Krishnaswamy 08:09, 22 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adkrish22290 (talk • contribs)

As Patni computers Systems was taken over by iGATE, so it is better to merge igate and patni in wiki. By Dhimant Kumar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.29.232.107 (talk) 05:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it will be better to merge igate and patni in wiki

I hope it will be better to merge igate and patni in wiki, as both of them integrated together, we can make sections in it as the history of patni and history of iGATE. --~~User:Dineshkumar_Ponnusamy~~ —Preceding undated comment added 10:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

please combine igate and patni into one page i.e is iGATE

It is better to to merge iGate-PATNI page & Create separate section for iGate-PATNI in this page (IGATE)

Sasidatta (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

iGATE Corporation Strides Towards ‘One Company’

With reference to the below page , which is officially published in 'iGATE' corporate website (effective from May 7, 2012), it is suggested to merge iGATE Patni page into iGATE page of Wiki. http://www.igate.com/press-release/2012/igate-corporation-strides-towards-one-company.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajkumarmpr (talk • contribs) 22:01, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 please combine igate and patni into one page i.e is iGATE
+It is better to to merge iGate-PATNI page & Create separate section for iGate-PATNI
-== ADD HISTORY FIELD  TO IGATE ==
+in this page (IGATE)
+[[User:Sasidatta|Sasidatta]] ([[User talk:Sasidatta|talk]]) 20:31, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
-it will be very useful if you add history to igate page
 == iGATE Corporation Strides Towards ‘One Company’ ==