Talk:MasterChef (American TV series) season 4: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:40, 19 August 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MasterChef (American TV series) season 4 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage List‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States: Television List‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

CW?

I wonder what's up with the CWs and why are some people rated higher than others are? Like them being in Top 5 instead of Top 9? 176.109.57.119 (talk) 18:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just add, what the hell is the use of that in the summary table? It's confusing and doesn't really add anything benefitial to this section. I don't know who came up with this idea, and I really feel like removing this whole CW column, but I wanna know if people actually think it's a good idea or not. ─ Fabzzz _talk 04:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was just wondering why it was there too, it seems like trivial information that really isn't needed. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that there is now a board dedicated only for that is just beyond me. It's plain useless, why bother? ─ Fabzzz _talk 05:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm for removing it. It looks like it is ranking the cooks' ability based on "wins"- ie who is best cook...if this is the case it is very skewed...only the personal wins should count, not the team wins, since individual performance in team wins may have been terrible and a total fail so not an indication of their true abilities as a cook as it seems to imply. Omgoodnessme (talk) 02:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, what are we waiting for : ) ─ Fabzzz _talk 01:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. The "cumulative wins" section is extraneous and pointless. I'm all for its removal, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.59.57 (talk) 19:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ::::I'm for removing it.  It looks like it is ranking the cooks' ability based on "wins"- ie who is best cook...if this is the case it is very skewed...only the personal wins should count, not the team wins, since individual performance in team wins may have been terrible and a total fail so not an indication of their true abilities as a cook as it seems to imply. [[User:Omgoodnessme|Omgoodnessme]] ([[User talk:Omgoodnessme|talk]]) 02:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 :::::So, what are we waiting for : ) ─ [[User:Fabzzz|'''<font color="red">F</font><font color="orange">a</font><font color="gold">b</font><font color="green">z</font><font color="blue">z</font><font color="purple">z</font>''']] [[User talk:Fabzzz|<font color="pink"><sub>talk</sub></font>]] 01:28, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
-::::::I concur.  The "cumulative wins" section is extraneous and pointless.  I'm all for its removal, too.
+::::::I concur.  The "cumulative wins" section is extraneous and pointless.  I'm all for its removal, too.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/97.102.59.57|97.102.59.57]] ([[User talk:97.102.59.57|talk]]) 19:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->