Talk:Boundless (company): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
James Cage (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
James Cage (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=start|ts=20130715233509|reviewer=Sionk}} |
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=start|ts=20130715233509|reviewer=Sionk}} |
||
==Page References== |
|||
I disagree that this is an advertisement, and would appreciate any specific examples of promotional content, inappropriate links, etc. Please see [[User talk:DGG#Boundless_.28company.29_and_Inkling]] for some discussion about this article. Thanks [[User:James Cage|James Cage]] ([[User talk:James Cage|talk]]) 16:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Regarding this sentence: "Users can also find equivalent information based on a page number or range of pages." (From a prior revision, not currently in text.) |
|||
This may appear to be promotional in nature. I believe this is a feature that is important to understanding the product, and also to understanding the lawsuit that this company is currently engaged in. This feature is of interest to users and instructors because class reading assignments (and scope of tests) do not always follow clean chapter breaks. |
|||
I believe this information should be reinstated - thoughts? |
|||
Thanks -- [[User:James Cage|James Cage]] ([[User talk:James Cage|talk]]) 02:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:46, 21 August 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boundless (company) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Articles for creation Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Page References
Regarding this sentence: "Users can also find equivalent information based on a page number or range of pages." (From a prior revision, not currently in text.)
This may appear to be promotional in nature. I believe this is a feature that is important to understanding the product, and also to understanding the lawsuit that this company is currently engaged in. This feature is of interest to users and instructors because class reading assignments (and scope of tests) do not always follow clean chapter breaks.
I believe this information should be reinstated - thoughts?
Thanks -- James Cage (talk) 02:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)