User talk:Pseudonymous Rex/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

(welcome)

Hello, Pseudonymous Rex, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

HEY BAILAR CONTIGO!

The article has the rules that have to have a musical article, so i don't understand why you follow saying that the article is bad. Sorry with my english :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.249.84.119 (talk) 03:35, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

I agree that the article should be kept, but the discussion needs to establish a consensus. It might take another week before that happens.

Estoy de acuerdo en que el artículo se debe retenido, pero la discusión tiene que establecer un consenso. El proceso puede durar una semana antes de que ocurra.

Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 04:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. INeverCry 01:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

No "email this user" ...

... so I won't link to the article feedback tool oversight request that I declined, but while it contained a presumably real name, there was no other identifying information in that post--no phone number, location, age, etc. that would have uniquely identified that person or allowed them to be contacted. If it'd had anything beyond what WAS there, then yes, I would probably have oversighted it. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the helpful follow-up. I understand now that one's "identity" is more than just a name with no other information. I'll keep that in mind should I run across a similar situation. Sincerely, Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 04:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

VE newsletter

Hey Pseudonymous Rex

We just deployed another VisualEditor release; bugs fixed include:

• Firefox 13/14 has been temporarily blacklisted, to avoid the insertion of broken links [[./that look like this]] (50720)
• Changing a reference in a template should no longer produce the bright red "you don't have a references block!" error (bugzilla:50423)
• Notices are now shown if you're editing a protected or semi-protected page (bugzilla:50415)
• The template inspector will no longer invite you to insert parameters that are already being used (50715)
• Same as above, but with aliases (50717)
• Parameter names in the template dialogue now word-wrap (50800)
• The link inspector will not show in the top left if you hit the return key while opening it (49941)
• Hitting return twice in the link editor will no longer introduce a new line that overwrites the link (51075)
• Oddly-named categories no longer cause corruption (50702)
• The toolbar no longer occasionally covers the cursor (48787)
• Changing the formatting of text no longer occasionally scrolls you upwards (50792)

Not specific bugs, but other things; cacheing is now improved, so people should stop seeing temporary breaking when the VisualEditor updates, and RTL support has received some patches. I hope this newsletter is helpful to people; I'll send out another one with the next deployment :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

VE newsletter

Hey Pseudonymous Rex! Another set of patches :). Today we have:

• Required template parameters are now automatically added to new templates (50747)
• Templates with piped links now display correctly when you alter them (50801)
• If your edit token expires, you're now informed of it (50424).

  You still won't be able to save - that's due to be fixed on Monday :).

More on Monday, I suspect. Hope you have a good weekend :). I should also have some news about the IP launch pretty soon. Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

(if you're seeing this and aren't the newsletter recipient - please do sign up here)

VE newsletter

Hey Pseudonymous Rex; hope you had a decent weekend :). We've got a pile of patches, some of which went out on Monday, some yesterday:

• If you insert wikitext such as links or section headers, you get a notice in the top right corner (over the save button). It doesn't go away until click, though once dismissed you don't get another one that edit. (49820)
• If your edit token expires, VE fetches a new one for you so you can save. (50424)
• If the page is empty of content but does have something non-content (like a category or an HTML comment), VE no longer crashes on load - (50289)
• sub tags are no longer removed ((49873)
• If you type at the end of links, they now extend
• Templates now only take a single click to insert
• Clear annotations clears links (50461)
• The link inspector stays open when you click to another item (50895)
• Typing after multi-byte characters no longer creats pawn icons (51140)
• Resizing thumbnails that have a default size set now works (50645)
• References made by tag:ref now display properly (bugzilla:50978)
• The VE is integrated with the spam blacklist (50826)
• Feedbacl link goes to the right language (bugzilla:47730)

There are a lot more improvements coming, but that's it for Monday and Tuesday. Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 08:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Yelp

Links: Yelp, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Pseydonymous. You may have seen it on the article's Talk page already, but I just wanted to make sure you knew I was a PR rep for Yelp, which is why I made my suggestion on the Talk page. If there's any way I can support your contributions to the page in a PR capacity, like providing hard-to-access sources, asking for input by subject-matter experts at the company, etc., let me know. I know Kiethbob would like input on a few things and creating a lead that summarizes the entire article (per WP:LEAD) is probably the biggest thing that's needed before it's ready for a Good Article Nomination. I'm around if there's any way I can help. CorporateM (Talk) 05:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Pseudonymous Rex (talk) 05:32, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

I made some copyedits and posted a few comments RE the lead. Thanks for chipping in! I think with the expanded lead, we should be just about done - or at least, as "done" as a Wikipedia page can get - knowing that it is an indefinite work-in-progress. CorporateM (Talk) 15:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

VE newsletter

Hey Pseudonymous Rex. The newest updates:

• Links now don't extend over space/punctuation/workbreaks when you type (bugzilla:51463)
• Users with the "minoredit" preference set get working functionality (bugzilla:51515)
• You can tab to buttons in dialogs, including the save dialog (bugzilla:50047)
• We now show the <newarticletext> (or <newarticletextanon>) message as an edit notice (bugzilla:51459)
• You can scroll dialog panels like in transclusions' templates' parameter listings (bugzilla:51739)
• Templates that only create meta-data and no display content at all (like Template:Use dmy dates) now can't be deleted accidentally or deliberately, but still don't show up (bugzilla:51322)
• FlaggedRevisions integration (bugzilla:49699)
• Edit summary will get the section title pre-added if you launched from a section edit link (bugzilla:50872)

Along with some miscellaneous language support fixes. That's all for today; as always, let us know if you spot more bugs. Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)