User talk:Ihaveabutt: Difference between revisions

How to I put away the "big billboard" of wikipedia policies that appears at the top of my talk page? --Ihaveabutt (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it for you. Is this what you were looking to achieve, or would you like me to undo my edit? Beach drifter (talk)

You could have edited your talk page yourself and removed it. WP:TALK lists guidelines for Talk pages and mentions User talk pages specifically. In this case, removal implies that you have read the item.—C45207 | Talk 05:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Wiki tags

Hi there;

I noticed your messages on User talk:Saint.Pierre.Pro, and thought I might be able to explain about 'nowiki' tags.

You can display Wikipedia 'code' without it being processed by putting <nowiki> at the beginning, and </nowiki> at the end. For example, if you put <nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki> it will display like this: {{helpme}} - so that you can show somebody the 'code' for the helpme template without actually calling helpers.

I hope that this helps; for more info, see Help:Wikitext examples#Just show what I typed.

Chzz ► 06:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Jones

Hi there!! and sorry the delay... I saw things about it... but to be honest, i never saw very deep on the subject... But please keep in touch about it and let´s make a conversation (included the article about this).

Best regards. Lightwarrior2 (talk) 03:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AE 911 Truth

I thought I had put the warning back after reverting the rest of the changes. My mistake. Oreo Priest ^talk 20:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop posting on my talk page. The article's talk page is the place for that. Oreo Priest ^talk 21:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok we can discuss it there, but I do not believe your combative sarcasm such as "if you have something useful to say" belong on any page. --Ihaveabutt (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the discussion page, you endeavor to note that bazant's view is an expert opinion. However, having a name, and publishing a paper on a different topic, does not make bazant an expert on how scientists view controlled demolition. He doesn't become an expert on that by virtue of the fact that people might assume his is. Rather, you have to have the actual knowledge produced with a credible method. --Ihaveabutt (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a POV-section (section) warning, because my concern is that this specific section (and the other place where bazant is misleadingly quoted). --Ihaveabutt (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a POV template warning

Thanks for the help!!

Cutting and saving to, this:

WP:DISPUTE.

--Ihaveabutt (talk) 01:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 --[[User:Ihaveabutt|Ihaveabutt]] ([[User talk:Ihaveabutt#top|talk]]) 05:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
-== Map ==
+== other ==
+--[[User:Ihaveabutt|Ihaveabutt]] ([[User talk:Ihaveabutt#top|talk]]) 05:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
-{{tl|help}}
-What is a useful venue to help get resolution of this:
-::Contested interpretations of a primary source quote.
-:::Assuming that you've tried the talk page of the article route and/or calm discussion directly on the disputing editors' talk pages (always the first steps), and you've already failed to make headway, I think [[Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests]] would be a good place to try, as well as [[Wikipedia:Third opinion]]. Eventually, if nothing works, you can try doing doing a [[WP:RFC|request for comment]].--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 19:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 ==  "big billboard" of wikipedia policies  ==