Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Richman: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Oliver Richman. (TW)
 
delsort
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|Oliver Richman}})
:({{Find sources|Oliver Richman}})
Notability seems marginal at best, doesn't seem to be anything substantial beyond than youtube hits and notable relatives, entire article reads more like a promotional bio than an encyclopedia article, and no real sources beyond a few fluff press releases and blog reviews [[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 01:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Notability seems marginal at best, doesn't seem to be anything substantial beyond than youtube hits and notable relatives, entire article reads more like a promotional bio than an encyclopedia article, and no real sources beyond a few fluff press releases and blog reviews [[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 01:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid">[[User:Gongshow|'''<span style="color:black">&nbsp;Gong&nbsp;</span>''']]</span><span style="background-color:black;border:1px solid">[[User_talk:Gongshow|'''<span style="color:#ffffff">show</span>''']]</span></small> 01:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 01:55, 26 August 2013

Oliver Richman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability seems marginal at best, doesn't seem to be anything substantial beyond than youtube hits and notable relatives, entire article reads more like a promotional bio than an encyclopedia article, and no real sources beyond a few fluff press releases and blog reviews Jac16888 Talk 01:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Gong show 01:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]