Jump to content

Talk:Word Up! (song): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 51: Line 51:


The current consensus for single covers in section infoboxes to represent notable cover versions are that they pass [[WP:NFCC]] and [[WP:NFCI]]. Since [[WP:SONGCOVER]] says notable cover versions should be covered in the article about the song and not have its own article, but if they had their own articles, the images would be acceptable there, so they are acceptable in the sections of the song article. The single covers are not alternate covers for Cameo cover, it is the primary cover for the cover versions and should be treated as such. If it is felt that the images should still be removed than the images should be taken to [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]] instead of simply removed from the article. [[User:Aspects|Aspects]] ([[User talk:Aspects|talk]]) 18:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The current consensus for single covers in section infoboxes to represent notable cover versions are that they pass [[WP:NFCC]] and [[WP:NFCI]]. Since [[WP:SONGCOVER]] says notable cover versions should be covered in the article about the song and not have its own article, but if they had their own articles, the images would be acceptable there, so they are acceptable in the sections of the song article. The single covers are not alternate covers for Cameo cover, it is the primary cover for the cover versions and should be treated as such. If it is felt that the images should still be removed than the images should be taken to [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]] instead of simply removed from the article. [[User:Aspects|Aspects]] ([[User talk:Aspects|talk]]) 18:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
: '''KEEP''': They are single art covers for notable cover versions.--[[User:Hotwiki|SuperHotWiki]] ([[User talk:Hotwiki|talk]]) 00:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:36, 28 August 2013

WikiProject iconKorn (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korn, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconSongs Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconR&B and Soul Music Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

This page ought to be moved to Word Up! (Melanie B). There are other versions: Word Up! Word Up! (Korn)

Word Up! is about the Cameo album. This article should be expanded to include the Cameo version of the song, and the Korn version should be merged here. Articles about songs should be about all versions of the song, other versions should not be given their own articles. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gun version

Shouldn't Gun's 1994 cover of this song be mentioned more prominently here? The single was a top 10 hit in the UK and a big hit in many other countries, and their version is probably better known than any other version bar Cameo's original. 217.155.20.163 01:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely pathetic that Gun's version isn't given more prominence. It was Top Ten in the UK in the 1990s, but it's only given ONE line! What's with Mel B's multiple mixes getting all the limelight? It only had a brief flirtation with the Top Twenty before dropping like a stone. There's even more about that than there is about Cameo's original version! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.141.100 (talk) 04:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truck Commercial

Who did the one used in the truck commercial? 76.126.29.36 (talk) 18:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KoRn

The KoRn version sounds identical to the original. 169.233.59.119 (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origins and meaning of the phrase "word up"

Someone please add section about the origins and meaning of the phrase "word up". Karl gregory jones (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional version

A lesser-known version of the song can be found on Rich Hopkins & Friends' LP "Los Monstros del Tucson Rock" (San Jacinto Records, 2004), with Greg the homeless guy on bass & vocals. Bgungle (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exclamation Point

Actually, only the album is called "Word Up!" The song is just "Word Up", no exclamation point. Here's the single's label and here's the album's back cover. Accordingly, I am editing and moving this.—Chowbok 20:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the edit is incorrect: the single is calles "word up!" with an exclamation mark, see front and rear cover of the single. you have conveniently taken a dutch pressing and the back insert of the album cd release, while ignoring the original release.

front cover: [1] back cover: [2] - esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 01:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the label that determines the song title, not the sleeve. I didn't realize the image was of the Dutch label (and was the "conveniently" really necessary? Way to AGF), but here's the American: [3].—Chowbok 01:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
cheers. it's the cover that determines the song title, however -- i shall add further sources from printed media once i dig them out. - esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use of notable cover version single cover

Since the images, File:GunWordUp.jpg, File:Wordupcover.jpg, and File:Word_Up!.jpg have been removed by one editor citing WP:NFCC and reverted by three other editors also citing WP:NFCC, I am starting a discussion here so that the images is not deleted simply for being orphaned.

The single covers for the Gun, Melanie B and Korn cover versions pass the points of WP:NFCC. WP:NFCC#3 is met because the single covers is used for identification its respective versions and Cameo single cover cannot convey equivalent significant information and/or identification of the cover versions. WP:NFCC#8 is met because the single covers are used for identification and the images increas readers' understanding and not having them would be detrimental to the understanding of the cover versions. The single covers passes the first example of acceptable use of fair images at WP:NFCI: "Cover art: Cover art from various items, for visual identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)."

The current consensus for single covers in section infoboxes to represent notable cover versions are that they pass WP:NFCC and WP:NFCI. Since WP:SONGCOVER says notable cover versions should be covered in the article about the song and not have its own article, but if they had their own articles, the images would be acceptable there, so they are acceptable in the sections of the song article. The single covers are not alternate covers for Cameo cover, it is the primary cover for the cover versions and should be treated as such. If it is felt that the images should still be removed than the images should be taken to Wikipedia:Files for deletion instead of simply removed from the article. Aspects (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: They are single art covers for notable cover versions.--SuperHotWiki (talk) 00:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]