Talk:Tiki Wiki CMS Groupware: Difference between revisions
→"Office Suite"?: new section |
Marclaporte (talk | contribs) →"Office Suite"?: Adding links to answer Morfusmax's question |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The page header describes TikiWiki as an "office suite", and it's included in [[Comparison of office suites]], but how is it an office suite as opposed to a CMS? An office suite usually has the capacity to handle different document/file types such as spreadsheet, image, database, etc. If TikiWiki can do all that, it isn't mentioned on this page. [[User:Morfusmax|Morfusmax]] ([[User talk:Morfusmax|talk]]) 19:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
The page header describes TikiWiki as an "office suite", and it's included in [[Comparison of office suites]], but how is it an office suite as opposed to a CMS? An office suite usually has the capacity to handle different document/file types such as spreadsheet, image, database, etc. If TikiWiki can do all that, it isn't mentioned on this page. [[User:Morfusmax|Morfusmax]] ([[User talk:Morfusmax|talk]]) 19:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
@Morfusmax: It is both. Please see: http://doc.tiki.org/Spreadsheet, http://doc.tiki.org/Draw, http://doc.tiki.org/Trackers, http://doc.tiki.org/Slideshow --[[User:Marclaporte|Marclaporte]] ([[User talk:Marclaporte|talk]]) 05:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:45, 29 August 2013
Computing Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 30 July 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
needs NPOV work
Reads like a commercial, needs NPOV work, I don'tk now enough about the subject to make specific suggestions. Pakaran (ark a pan) 05:15, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Did what I could to balance it a little more. Just started working with the project, so I'll add more as necessary. EighenIndemnis
I have reworded it a bit more. I have worked with TikiWiki for several years, but I think this is a reasonably neutral description now. awcolley 23:11, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Removing the NPOV warning. If the current wording is still non-neutral, please advise. awcolley 21:07, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Does anyone what criticisms of tikiwiki there are? They should be added, otherwise the article seems biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.213.144 (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
TikiWiki not at all a structured wiki like dasiy, Foswiki or TWiki is. Its not usable with a database like approach. The structure they mean is creating a content structure like a book :-(
- http://doc.tikiwiki.org/Trackers (forms & database) & http://doc.tikiwiki.org/Structures (book) are different features. Marclaporte (talk) 21:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Article now contains a number of external references with links. I would like to remove the Original research notice. Ricks99 (talk) 13:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- With no objections noted, I am removing the Original research notice --Ricks99 (talk) 17:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
"Office Suite"?
The page header describes TikiWiki as an "office suite", and it's included in Comparison of office suites, but how is it an office suite as opposed to a CMS? An office suite usually has the capacity to handle different document/file types such as spreadsheet, image, database, etc. If TikiWiki can do all that, it isn't mentioned on this page. Morfusmax (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
@Morfusmax: It is both. Please see: http://doc.tiki.org/Spreadsheet, http://doc.tiki.org/Draw, http://doc.tiki.org/Trackers, http://doc.tiki.org/Slideshow --Marclaporte (talk) 05:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)