Talk:Albert Langer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:35, 8 September 2013

Biography: Politics and Government C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Melbourne C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Albert Langer is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

DOB

Does anyone know Albert's date of birth? Adam 29 June 2005 03:33 (UTC) There are an awful lot of "citation neededs" on this page. If a writer does not have a source for a statement, or does not know where a particular tidbit came from, then it seems to me he or she is relying on rumour and hearsay rather than fact, which means such information could well be wrong or only partly right. Unless one wishes to devalue the worth of Wikipedia by turning it into a rumour mill rather than the online equivalent of an encyclopedia such information should either not be used at all--that is, wait until it is confirmed then include it--or it should be filed separately from the information one is certain of (under a heading titled something like "Unconfirmed Information"). [Stephen Souter]

Voting system

Which voting system was used? ( i.e. please explain voting 1,2,2,2) RJFJR 22:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other way...

The 2013 federal election results show a massive swing of nearly 17% towards non-voting, in addition to nearly 6% of the turnout who voted informal (over 10% in ten seats). Bjenks (talk) 07:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==Voting system==
 Which voting system was used?  ( i.e. please explain voting 1,2,2,2) [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] 22:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
+== The other way... ==
+The 2013 federal [[Talk:Electoral system of Australia#Australia votes (excepting those who dissent)|election results]] show a massive swing of nearly 17% towards non-voting, in addition to nearly 6% of the turnout who voted informal ([http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseInformalByDivision-17496-NAT.htm over 10% in ten seats]). [[User:Bjenks|Bjenks]] ([[User talk:Bjenks|talk]]) 07:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)