User talk:Shivamevolution

Shivamevolution, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Shivamevolution! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivam Patil.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mentabolism (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Shivam Patil (August 8)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivam Patil.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 15:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Shivam Patil was accepted

Shivam Patil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shivam Patil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shivam Patil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. LGA _talk^edits 19:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Shivam Patil. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Your additions are promotional and not written in an encyclopaedic tone; please propose changes to the talk page. LGA _talk^edits 23:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback, tone fixed. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't believe you have, but I am now not going to edit the page due to WP:3RR, There are still sections unsourced and it is still promotional. LGA _talk^edits 23:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

If you could help me out and bring attention to which bits are still promotional? I'll also cut out anything that's unsourced, though I don't know if there is any reliable reference for Shivam Patil's education on the internet. Also kindly remove the sections you feel require citations or sources, reducing the article to a 2 line stub makes no sense. There's a lot of referenced information you remove when you do that. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Sock puppetry ?

Is there any connection between you and Prakhar Lucknow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) ? LGA _talk^edits 23:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Nope. Someone who regularly adds minor edits to Shivam Patil, apparently. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivamevolution, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LGA _talk^edits 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivamevolution, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LGA _talk^edits 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  —SpacemanSpiff 10:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Shivamevolution (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

If two people use the same PC to access & edit wikipedia, how is it sock puppetry? I asked my older brother to help edit the article Shivam Patil objectively, apparently he created a new ID to do it, and I got blocked for sock puppetry? There was no vandalism, not even any bad edits, so why the blocking? I have no connection to the other blocked group either. Is it a compulsion for multiple users to use the same account on one PC? Shivamevolution (talk) 11:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=If two people use the same PC to access & edit wikipedia, how is it sock puppetry? I asked my older brother to help edit the article [[Shivam Patil]] objectively, apparently he created a new ID to do it, and I got blocked for sock puppetry? There was no vandalism, not even any bad edits, so why the blocking? I have no connection to the other blocked group either. Is it a compulsion for multiple users to use the same account on one PC? [[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 11:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=If two people use the same PC to access & edit wikipedia, how is it sock puppetry? I asked my older brother to help edit the article [[Shivam Patil]] objectively, apparently he created a new ID to do it, and I got blocked for sock puppetry? There was no vandalism, not even any bad edits, so why the blocking? I have no connection to the other blocked group either. Is it a compulsion for multiple users to use the same account on one PC? [[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 11:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=If two people use the same PC to access & edit wikipedia, how is it sock puppetry? I asked my older brother to help edit the article [[Shivam Patil]] objectively, apparently he created a new ID to do it, and I got blocked for sock puppetry? There was no vandalism, not even any bad edits, so why the blocking? I have no connection to the other blocked group either. Is it a compulsion for multiple users to use the same account on one PC? [[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 11:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(talk page stalker) As the person who opened the SPI I would like to point out that there is more to the editing patten between the two account that point to the fact they are operated by one person, I am happy to provide more off wiki to a reviewing admin if they e-mail me direct, not going into it here as per WP:BEANS. LGA _talk^edits 11:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)