Talk:Stax Records: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:55, 14 September 2013

Record Labels B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tennessee B‑class Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Stax Records is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Working on articles

I'm working on articles for the phenomenon - The Memphis Sound: Southern soul, Southern rock, Stax, The Mar-keys ) and members and other Memphis Sound people:

Quinobi 16:08, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

There. More of the stuff resolves now.

Quinobi 19:20, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Introduction

I believe the introduction is getting too long now and should be shortened. I may shorten the intro myself when I get around to it. Steelbeard1 (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the last paragraph of the intro is expendable as it duplicates info in the body of the article. What do you think? I may delete it myself tomorrow. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think far too much has ben removed. The intro should properly summarize the topic at hand, to where one doesn't necessarily have to read the (on the long side) article to get the general gist of who or what it is about. The old intro also had the misfortune of having a poor tone (While Stax almost exclusively produced African-American music, the label is noted for having several popular ethnically-integrated bands." is a very problematic sentence), At three paragraphs (one of which is rather short), the new intro properly sets up the article, and explain the important points of what Stax was, who was primarily involved with it, and why they are important enough to have an article. --70.119.13.45 (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:08, 26 February 2012 edit 78.26 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 71,033 edits m assess importance for Labels ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:55, 14 September 2013 edit undo Yobot (talk \| contribs) Bots 4,733,870 edits m Tagging using AWB (9480) Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Record Labels \|class=B \|importance=mid}}		{{WikiProject Record Labels\|class=B \|importance=mid}}
	{{WikiProject Tennessee\|class=B\|importance=low\|listas=Stax Records}}		{{WikiProject Tennessee\|class=B\|importance=low\|listas=Stax Records}}