User talk:Shivamevolution: Difference between revisions
→Reliable sources: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
If you could help me out and bring attention to which bits are still promotional? I'll also cut out anything that's unsourced, though I don't know if there is any reliable reference for [[Shivam Patil]]'s education on the internet. Also kindly remove the sections you feel require citations or sources, reducing the article to a 2 line stub makes no sense. There's a lot of referenced information you remove when you do that. --[[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 23:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
If you could help me out and bring attention to which bits are still promotional? I'll also cut out anything that's unsourced, though I don't know if there is any reliable reference for [[Shivam Patil]]'s education on the internet. Also kindly remove the sections you feel require citations or sources, reducing the article to a 2 line stub makes no sense. There's a lot of referenced information you remove when you do that. --[[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 23:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
== [[WP:Sock|Sock puppetry]] ? == |
|||
Is there any connection between you and {{Userlinks|Prakhar Lucknow}} ? <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]] [[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 23:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Nope. Someone who regularly adds minor edits to [[Shivam Patil]], apparently. --[[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 23:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivamevolution]], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to investigations]], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]] [[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)}} |
|||
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
|||
}} <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]] [[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivamevolution]], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to investigations]], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]] [[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)}} |
|||
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
|||
}} <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]] [[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== September 2013 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppetry]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 10:13, 10 September 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=If two people use the same PC to access & edit wikipedia, how is it sock puppetry? I asked my older brother to help edit the article [[Shivam Patil]] objectively, apparently he created a new ID to do it, and I got blocked for sock puppetry? There was no vandalism, not even any bad edits, so why the blocking? I have no connection to the other blocked group either. Is it a compulsion for multiple users to use the same account on one PC? [[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 12:00 pm, Today (UTC+1) | decline=Whether the accounts in question were operated by one individual or two, [[WP:MEAT|we still treat it as sockpuppetry]]. [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]] [[User talk:Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">雲</span>]]‍[[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">水</span>]] 11:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)}} |
|||
:{{tps}} As the person who opened the SPI I would like to point out that there is more to the editing patten between the two account that point to the fact they are operated by '''one''' person, I am happy to provide more off wiki to a reviewing admin if they e-mail me direct, not going into it here as per [[WP:BEANS]]. <font face="Lucida Sans">'''[[User:LGA|<font color="#90EE90">LGA</font>]] [[User talk:LGA|<font color="#8B0000"><sub>talk</sub></font>]]'''<sup style="margin-left:-4ex">[[Special:Contributions/LGA|<font color="#006400">edits</font>]]</sup></font> 11:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:It doesn't matter if it was you or your brother, you just said that you asked him to help you out in an editing dispute. That is clearly not allowed per [[WP:SOCK]]. —[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#BA181F">Spaceman</font>]]'''[[User_talk:SpacemanSpiff|<font color="#2B18BA">Spiff</font>]]''' 11:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:: Umm, okay then. I'll wait the 2 weeks out.--[[User:Shivamevolution|Shivamevolution]] ([[User talk:Shivamevolution#top|talk]]) 14:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Reliable sources == |
== Reliable sources == |
||
Revision as of 12:38, 25 September 2013
Shivamevolution, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Shivamevolution! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivam Patil.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mentabolism (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Shivam Patil (August 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivam Patil.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 15:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Shivam Patil was accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Shivam Patil
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shivam Patil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. LGA talkedits 19:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Shivam Patil. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Your additions are promotional and not written in an encyclopaedic tone; please propose changes to the talk page. LGA talkedits 23:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback, tone fixed. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I don't believe you have, but I am now not going to edit the page due to WP:3RR, There are still sections unsourced and it is still promotional. LGA talkedits 23:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
If you could help me out and bring attention to which bits are still promotional? I'll also cut out anything that's unsourced, though I don't know if there is any reliable reference for Shivam Patil's education on the internet. Also kindly remove the sections you feel require citations or sources, reducing the article to a 2 line stub makes no sense. There's a lot of referenced information you remove when you do that. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Reliable sources
Blogs are not reliably published sources. Patil is not a reliable source for self promotional claims that he won awards. see WP:RS. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)