User talk:Shivamevolution: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:39, 25 September 2013

Shivamevolution, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Shivamevolution! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivam Patil.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mentabolism (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Shivam Patil (August 8)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivam Patil.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 15:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Shivam Patil was accepted

Shivam Patil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Shivam Patil. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Your additions are promotional and not written in an encyclopaedic tone; please propose changes to the talk page. LGA _talk^edits 23:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, tone fixed. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe you have, but I am now not going to edit the page due to WP:3RR, There are still sections unsourced and it is still promotional. LGA _talk^edits 23:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you could help me out and bring attention to which bits are still promotional? I'll also cut out anything that's unsourced, though I don't know if there is any reliable reference for Shivam Patil's education on the internet. Also kindly remove the sections you feel require citations or sources, reducing the article to a 2 line stub makes no sense. There's a lot of referenced information you remove when you do that. --Shivamevolution (talk) 23:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Blogs are not reliably published sources. Patil is not a reliable source for self promotional claims that he won awards. see WP:RS. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is NOT a fanpage

If you want to create a fanpage and include every gushing review, you can. On your own webspace. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Just because there is a source does not mean it gets included in the article. 2 reviews about a single performance is more than enough. 5 is completely outrageous. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 Blogs are not reliably published sources. Patil is not a reliable source for self promotional claims that he won awards. see [[WP:RS]]. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 11:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
+==Wikipedia is NOT a fanpage==
+If you want to create a fanpage and include every gushing review, you can. On your own webspace. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Just because there is a source does not mean it gets included in the article. 2 reviews about a single performance is more than enough. 5 is completely outrageous. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 15:39, 25 September 2013 (UTC)