Talk:History of the rupee: Difference between revisions
Malatinszky (talk | contribs) The Valuation history section has arithmetic contradictions. |
Malatinszky (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
== Valuation history == |
== Valuation history == |
||
The section titled ''Valuation history'' states that a) The Indian Rupee was pegged to the British Sterling from 1926 to 1966 at INR 13.33 to 1 Pound; and that b) the USD/INR exchange rate was 1 in 1947. Given that the British pound was pegged at $4.03 in 1947, a) and b) are contradictory. I suggest removing the valuation history section until more reliable data is available. It's better to say nothing |
The section titled ''Valuation history'' states that a) The Indian Rupee was pegged to the British Sterling from 1926 to 1966 at INR 13.33 to 1 Pound; and that b) the USD/INR exchange rate was 1 in 1947. Given that the British pound was pegged at $4.03 in 1947, a) and b) are contradictory. I suggest removing the valuation history section until more reliable data is available. It's better to say nothing than to say something that's clearly incorrect [http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/1876776/standpoint-the-fallacy-of-dollar-rupee-in-1947 reinforcing the notion that Wikipedia is unreliable]. [[User:Malatinszky|Malatinszky]] ([[User talk:Malatinszky|talk]]) 05:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:23, 26 September 2013
 | India B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Numismatics B‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Price of Silver Chart
What is the price of silver being listed in? Pence per troy ounce? What is the exchange rate? Rupees per pound? It needs to be clarified Nik42 06:02, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Merger with Rupee
I think the fact that there's a specific page for the history of the rupee is a little unnecessary, since the original rupee article doesn't seem long enough to be split off into pages about categories such as "History". Plus, and I supoose this is a minor complaint, but the addition of "History of the rupee" seems to add an enormous amount of white space to the rupee template. El Cid 06:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Merger with Rupee
This article is the history of the Indian Rupee. Instead of merging with Rupee which has rupees of other countries, I suggest this article be merged with Indian Rupee.--PremKudvaTalk 09:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Let's keep the discussion in one place. Talk:Rupee. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 11:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
rupee versus Rupee
Rupee is a name of a currency. The word Rupee used in the title and elsewhere in the article should be in title case, Rupee and not rupee. -Vivek 221.134.214.7 21:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Rupee is a unit of measurement, therefore should not be capitalized unless it's the first word of a sentence. Non-currency units have been decapitalized too, even where they are derived from a proper noun. The SI unit of a force is a "newton", the SI unit of electric potential is a "volt", and the CGS unit of magnetic flux density is a "gauss". --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Indian "Rupees"
Can someone create new sections on the Bombay Rupee, Calcutta Rupee, Surat Rupee, Murshidabad Rupee, Sonaut Rupee, Madras Rupee, Farooqabad Rupee and Arcot Rupee?Anwar (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[1]
| Indian Rupees | Weight |
|---|---|
| Farooqabad Rupee | 180.234 grains troy |
| Calcutta Rupee | 191.916 grains troy |
| Madras Rupee | 180.000 grains troy (since 1818) |
Throughout the 19th century, the gold coinage was of the same weight and fineness as the silver but the ratio between gold and silver was liable to be varied from time to time by Government proclamation.
Rates of exchange between different rupees varied not only between presidencies but also between districts within a presidency.Anwar (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Bombay currency
| Monies of account | |
|---|---|
| 1 gold mohur | 3 paunchcas |
| 1 paunchca | 5 rupees |
| 1 rupee | 100 dooganis |
| 1 doogany | 2 urdees |
| 1 urdee | 2 reas |
| 1 pice | 4 reas |
| 1 doorea | 6 reas |
| 1 fuddea | 8 reas |
Calcutta currency
| Monies of account | |
|---|---|
| 1 gold mohur | 16 silver rupees |
| 1 silver rupee | 1 gunda |
| 1 gunda | 4 cowries |
| 1 cowry | 4 annas |
| 1 anna | 12 pices |
Madras currency
| Monies of account | |
|---|---|
| 1 pagoda | 3.50 rupees |
| 1 rupee | 12 fanams |
| 1 fanam | 4 pices |
| 1 pice | 2 dodees |
| 1 dodee | 10 cash |
decimalisation
The British pound underwent decimalisation in 1972, so the statement "At the end of 1969, the Indian Rupee was trading at around 13 British Pence. A decade later, by 1979, it was trading at around 6 British Pence. Finally by the end of 1989, the Indian Rupee had plunged to an all-time low of 3 British Pence." needs clarification. Also, pence and rupee should be in lower case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.146.14.225 (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Rupees1000.jpg
The image File:Rupees1000.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Valuation history
The section titled Valuation history states that a) The Indian Rupee was pegged to the British Sterling from 1926 to 1966 at INR 13.33 to 1 Pound; and that b) the USD/INR exchange rate was 1 in 1947. Given that the British pound was pegged at $4.03 in 1947, a) and b) are contradictory. I suggest removing the valuation history section until more reliable data is available. It's better to say nothing than to say something that's clearly incorrect reinforcing the notion that Wikipedia is unreliable. Malatinszky (talk) 05:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)