Talk:Louisiana State Act 159: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Untitled== |
==Untitled== |
||
There isn't ''Erythina'' genus. See [http://www.ipni.org/ipni/plantnamesearchpage.do INPI]. It is probably ''[[Erythrina]]''. Then the law has mispelling of word. |
There isn't ''Erythina'' genus. See [http://www.ipni.org/ipni/plantnamesearchpage.do INPI]. It is probably ''[[Erythrina]]''. Then the law has mispelling of word, which makes sense given the ignorance of Louisiana law makers to ban a list of plants that they know nothing about. ---- |
||
--[[User:Ricardo Carneiro Pires|Ricardo Carneiro Pires]] 16:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
--[[User:Ricardo Carneiro Pires|Ricardo Carneiro Pires]] 16:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:08, 28 September 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
There isn't Erythina genus. See INPI. It is probably Erythrina. Then the law has mispelling of word, which makes sense given the ignorance of Louisiana law makers to ban a list of plants that they know nothing about. ---- --Ricardo Carneiro Pires 16:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- List-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Louisiana articles
- Low-importance Louisiana articles
- WikiProject Louisiana articles
- WikiProject United States articles