Talk:Shraddha Kapoor

8:24 Shraddha stated ‘’ I was 17-18 when I was caste for Teen Patti’’

At 8:24 Shraddha stated ‘’ I was 17-18 when I was caste for Teen Patti’’ during a Talk Show. In conversation with Shraddha Kapoor and Alia Bhatt - Part 1 on Youtube. The existing birth date had no reliable source born (1989) other sites might provide about it but they had copied on the existing on Wikipedia page. We will confirm about it soon after we ask her.

She debuted in Teen Patti when she was 18 and according to the Yash Raj’s contract she signed a three film contract when she was 19. Her school records also provide she was born in 1992 not 1989. Do not put references on sites indicate she was born (1989) because they had copied on existing Wikipedia page? We are currently working on it.

Archana Ramdonee 08:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Shraddha Kapoor

Okay, lets admit that she stated she was 18 when she cast for Teen Patti and also the movie production was delay for 1 year. Till the movie releases she was 20 year old. Apparently, she must be 23 year old not 24.

Wikipedia can edit by anyone, Shraddha Kapoor, birth of date was always unknown. When the page was created her birth date was not included. Until, someone came and put she was born (1989). Other, sites also reliable to the fact that she was born 1989 as it was existing in her Wikipedia Page.

What if i tell you that Deepika Padukone, was not born (1986), but people trust it, because it exists in her wikipedia page. Lucywho, is a database to rate celebrity over the world. Inorder, to set prove of being a Celebrity, they link wikipedia page and IMBD. The description of wikipedia sticks to the description as well as in Lucywho. See Shraddha Kapoor profile and the description as well -----> http://www.lucywho.com/p5085792/shraddha-kapoor/ It describs as Shraddha Kapoor (Hindi: ??????? ????) is an Indian film actress who appears in Bollywood films. Her Debut movie was Teen Patti and she is mainly known for role played in movie Luv Ka The End. which indicates that her Wikipedia Page was created without her birthdate informations.

In any case, if think that (1989) is her real birth date prove some reliable sources to that then i willing to change or remove it. Furthermore, for other dicussion join https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shraddha_Kapoor to be able to talk about the conflicts about her sate.

Archana Ramdonee 04:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Shraddha Kapoor - Born 1989, not 1992.

To Archana Ramdonee - Shraddha Kapoor recently stated in an interview that she was 17 or 18 years old when she was cast in her debut film 'Teen Patti' (2010), which became the basis for an inaccurate edit on her age (from 24 years it was changed to 21 years). It is important to note that being "cast" in a film (pre-production) does not mean filming/production and certainly not the release of the film. Filming for 'Teen Patti' was delayed for over a year (http://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/2008/jul/230708bolly5.htm). The film having been shot from late-2008 to early-2009 makes Shraddha 19 years old at the time, as she has clearly stated that she attended college for 1 year at Boston University (http://m.idiva.com/news-entertainment/shraddha-kapoor-marry-only-if-youre-madly-in-love/22248), AFTER which she dropped out to shoot for her debut film (which was shot from late-2008 to early-2009 - http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/Big+B+gives+Teen+Patti+crew+a+treat/1/25819.html). Going by this and her March 3 birthday, she finished High School and started college in 2007, at the age of 18. This makes her about 21 during the release of 'Teen Patti' in 2010, which was the age leading media sources reported when they introduced the newborn actress. Therefore, 1989 is the correct year of birth here. Shraddha has never publicly denied her age to any reliable source in the media. For 5 years, leading national newspapers and television channels have consistently used March 3 1989 to state her age. Let's keep Wiki speculation-free and accurate. The last thing a Wiki editor should be is stubborn without logic. With your 1992 claim you are basically implying that Shraddha started college at 15, which is impossible. She has to be 18 when she starts college as she was born in March. Publicising inaccurate details - such as about age or height - also reflects badly on the person whose biography is on Wikipedia as it can easily be misunderstood by the general public as having been carried out by the celebrity.

Response to Archana Ramdonee - In 2007, at the age of 18, she was cast in 'Teen Patti'. This is because shooting for the film had to start in 2007! When she finished shooting in January 2009 (based on the source I provided), she was 19 (20 in 2 months). After shooting, post-production took another year and the film released on Feb 26, 2010, 4 days before her 21st birthday. I can give you a list of sources that refer to her as the 21-year-old newcomer/Shakti Kapoor's 21-year-old daughter in 2010. The sources are national newspapers such as The Times of India, which is not a joke. I had listed TOI sources when I edited and you reverted them. Deleting information based on such highly regarded, infallible sources is an act of vandalism, but I hope to resolve things peacefully here.

Xmisstree — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xmisstree (talk • contribs) 05:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Response to Xmisstree

You are not get it, those sources are not reliable sources. Reliable one are those, if the living person talks about it or officially announce it in their official site. The sources of national newspapers such as The Times of India, are not reliable to prove she was born (1989). There are numerous sites indicate she was born (1992). See example for Jacqueline Fernandez, her birthdate indicates she was born (11 June), sources such national newspapers provide that also. But, her actual birthdate was born (11 August), She clarifies in her Official Twitter Account as well as In Bollywood Hungama, she personally talk about it in a video and state she was born 11 August, those are reliable sources. Archana Ramdonee 05:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Take the best sources and use logic - No one announces their age!

In that case, 1992 is unreliable as well. Sources for 1992 are extremely poor and it's completely illogical.

What can best be done is take the best possible sources, such as national newspapers and reference them. If Shraddha had a problem with 1989 being her birth year, she would have said so at least once in 5 years! Jacqueline clarified her month of birth, an actress would definitely clarify her YEAR of birth if shes shown to be older, and to not do so in 5 years confirms that 1989 is correct.

Xmisstree — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xmisstree (talk • contribs) 05:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

How come (1992) sources, are poor and unreliable?

It does not seem so, as National Newspapers also indicates she was born (1992), and so is IMDB. Sources (1992) are reliable. Coming about declaring her age, if she has not declare it then, why all of a sudden her birth date had changed. You think a mosquito stuck me and i came in the page and change it from (1989 to 1992). Listen, i know what you might thinking, if you search Shraddha Kapoor, she was 1989, then after a while it become 1992.

Everyone must be wondering she had hid her age. Just because, every actresses did it. You had kept on begging my differ on that she was born 1989 not 1992. And also, provide sources to that. I had already clarified how was that misunderstanding produced.

Archana Ramdonee 06:30, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Archana Ramdonee 06:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Response to Archana Ramdonee

No national newspaper has written 1992, they all have 1989 since they first introduced Shraddha. Imdb is NOT a reliable source (refer to your own talk page for that).

Until and unless she clarifies, our job is to use the best, most consistent sources. The Times of India is the best, a feature by Cosmopolitan magazine is another. I used both. Kindly do the needful. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xmisstree (talk • contribs) 06:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

IMBD and National Newspapers are not also reliable sources.

I know IMBD and National Newspapers are not also reliable sources. National Newspapers are indeed not reliable, as an article is written by an author, they use a little bit of actuality and mix up with creative invention to make a story appear reliable. Sometimes, there articles are not even truth at all. Talking about IMBD, is a Internet Movie Database is the essence of tact as a reliability. Actors documentary might not be false at all. And, i had already explain what is a reliable source. I know what you might thinking, if you search Shraddha Kapoor, she was 1989, then after a while it become 1992. Everyone must be wondering she had hid her age. Just because, every actresses did it. You had kept on begging my differ on that she was born 1989 not 1992. And also, provide sources to that. I had already clarified how that misunderstanding was produced.

Archana Ramdonee 06:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Shradha Kapoor was born on 1989 not 1992

In a recent Talk show 'The Front Row With Anupama Chopra' Shraddha admitted that she is 24, which means she was born on 1989. The ones objecting must catch up with the interview video and fix her Wiki- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7vbA0uUdw0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luvmiles (talk • contribs) 11:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Birthday sources

I've reverted the recent addition as it did not actually provide a source for the birthday -- we need a verification that she was born on dd-mmm-yyyy, not that she celebrated her birthday with someone on xx date and a different ref saying she's yy age. Any such additions are in violation of our WP:BLP policy. —SpacemanSpiff 19:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

I've once again removed this per WP:BLP, the new ref added is clearly not WP:RS and not a personal profile either given the amount of ads etc on the site. Please DO NOT ADD any birthday without reliable referencing. —SpacemanSpiff 19:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 30 September 2013

Shahid Kapoor and Shraddha Kapoor roped in for Vishal Bhardwaj's 'Haider' http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shahid-kapoor-and-shraddha-kapoor-roped-in-for-vishal-bhardwajs-haider/1174033/ http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-25/news-interviews/42391885_1_vishal-bhardwaj-tabu-hamlet http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-26/news-interviews/42425755_1_haider-maqbool-hamlet-vishal Diaurevoir (talk) 03:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for these sources. I've used the first one (Indian Express), which is probably sufficient for this fact. --Stfg (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Edit request on 30 September 2013

==Special appearance==

Year	Film	Role	Notes
2014	Ungli	Herself	Special appearance in song "Basanti"

Diaurevoir (talk) 15:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

 Not done: It's already in the Filmography section --Stfg (talk) 16:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Vandal edits made by smauritius and categorizing reliable sources as unreliable since she does not want the shraddha'a real age to be revealed.

Smauritius is reverting my legit edits to DOB section with no authority and categorising the CINTAA link I provided as unreliable. Everyone in the cine field knows how important an organisation it is. It is the adjudicate authority for every contentious issue in the film/telly industry of mumbai. It is the only authoritative link one can provide to verify an actor's age. Also, I'm giving two more links for the skeptics to verify further. In this article (http://bollywoodstarkids.blogspot.in/2009/05/shakti-kapoors-son-siddhanths-first.html)her brother siddant mentions her age which is 22 in 2009 and in this article(http://www.filmfare.com/features/we-share-everything-except-our-husbands-padmini-kolhapure-3651.html) her aunt padmini kolhapure mentions about her mum shivangi being pregnant in 1986 when she was getting married. FYI, padmini kolhapure got married in August 1986.

Excuse me! i am not acting a Vandalism attack. Different newspapers and magazines indicates her age different, all of those links are secondary sources as well as creditable. We are not accept anything until we get a proper source, Many links proved her age differently. If the actress intended to real her age, it will be accurate to put it.

Archana Ramdonee 12:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Newspapers are not a reliable source whereas her own family members are. Even if you don't believe CINTAA's link you have but to believe what her own family members have said in different articles I have quoted above. Also, I have seen that there were earlier users who quoted her real date of birth as 3rd march 1987 and you engaged in a verbal attack with all of them. You seem to be a fanatical fan of shraddha who doesn't want authentic information about Shraddha published online. There is no use in trying to convince you as won't believe even if shraddha herself comes to tell you her age. I have already reported you. If you are a fan atleast be truthful to the acotr you're idolising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rose$keel (talk • contribs) 12:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

It is quite silly, you believe an CINTAA- Social Networking site, every one own an account. The actress stated she is 24 years old in newspaper TOI but yet i had not add it because some other sites prove her age differently. There are many creditable and accurate sources indicates her age differently, many others Users came to a conclusion not to add her DOB, as it is dubious, but sorry the way you are behaving it seems that you a user who i had already discuss, are using multiple of accounts, acting as different users???

Archana Ramdonee 14:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

This is not acceptable. I neither had any conversation with you earlier nor did I make any edits on Shraddha Kapoor page before. Even my IP can be checked if the admins don't believe me. Please don't make unfounded accusations. I found out about other users having an issue with you after reading your talk page. You are clearly not from India. Since you are saying CINTAA is a social networking site. Please do me a favour and register yourself with an account there. If it gets accepted then I'll not make any more attempt to reason with you. Please google CINTAA before talking./ You'll see if it is a social networking site or not. The actors themselves go to register at CINTAA to get protection from any disputes that may arise. -Rose$keel (talk) 04:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

So who does edit the content at CINTAA, and who reviews said edits? —C.Fred (talk) 04:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

1. http://in.eregnow.com/membership/register/demoassociation - registration form everyone can register. In CINTAA.

2. http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa - see the members

3. http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa?page=1 - There is no profiles of big celebrities.

4. The page indicated her age differently not 26 year old, after a couple of years why you had came a change her DOB, why don't know it earlier.

5. Shraddha Kapoor, never stated she is 26 year old. Even, she celebrated her age with media, BollywoodHungama.

6. Her age is still a mystery, it is unknown, it is quite logicable to leave it blank, adding DOB, is dubious at all. She never stated she is 26 year old. Archana Ramdonee 05:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

@Smauritius: Membership in CINTAA isn't the issue. The issue is, who edits the profiles? Anybody, the performer, or an editorial board at CINTAA? —C.Fred (talk) 13:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, birth date is also unknown, -----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/776

Kajol Devgan, DOB is unknown, -----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/542

Esha Deol, DOB is unknown, ---> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/1263

Kangna Ranaut, DOB is 1986 in CINTAA Profile -----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/3724, but in her official website and WIKI is 1987.

RoseKeel stated, Bollywood personalities went to the office of CINTAA, to register. They check their birth certificate to publish their age. So, why many celebrities age is not publish.

Everyone can own a sepecific account in CINTAA, Just to the link, http://www.cintaa.net/, in the right side, there is a member login box, just enter the email.address and password, you want 2 register, then it will provide that link ----> http://in.eregnow.com/membership/register/demoassociation, enter that choose your registration fee, re-type your mail address and password you want to register. You get the registration form, you fill the form, it will provide you, the biling form since since you do the payment, they will email your account.

Since, you had enter do the payment i don't think it your account cannot create. There is no need to go to the registration office, and all. I have done being a Mauritian citizen, so you guys can also do it.

CINTAA, is website where cine field knows how important an organisation. It is the adjudicate authority for every contentious issue in the film/telly industry of mumbai. Alia Bhatt, profile her DOB is unkonwn, ----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/6113

Katrina Kaif, profile her DOB is also unknown, ----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/5106

Bipasha Basu, profile her DOB is also unknown, ----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/1017

Is this what we called a legit website,

Shraddha Kapoor, age is a mystery/unknown, Times of India, indicate her as 24 year old (born 1989), Other sites, indicated her as (born 1992), she herself stated that she cast in her debut movie in 2010 when she was 18 years old make her 21 years old in 2013.

I had not add her DOB, as it sounds so dubious at all. Wait for is next year she will celebrate her DOB, in March 03, we might get a hint what her age is.... Till then, it is appropriate to leave her DOB section blank. I had an objection if Shraddha Kapoor source is reliable and accurate, so this apply also for Alia Bhatt, Bipasha Basu and Katrina Kaif, remove her DOB, an put blank over there depending on CINTAA Profiles.

But, yet i was threaten, warned and reported, i was not acting as a Vandalism at all. Where is my fault. This is the so-called WIKIPEDIA FOUNADTION, SO FAKED, COMPLETELY FAKED FOR ME, IT WAS SO UNFAIR TOWARDS ME..... i guess... I do not know where i was wrong. but i was reported and warned???

Archana Ramdonee 14:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

The fact that other Wikipedia articles may have content sourced to inappropriate sites does not mean that those inappropriate sites should be used to "verify" information in other Wikipedia articles. Social networking sites are not reliably published sources and neither are family claims.

If generally reliable sources have published different claims, then we can either leave it blank until there is a clear consensus among the reliable sources, or we can do: Born circa 1990 (ref 1 with date of 1989) (ref 2 with date of 1991)

Primary source documents are not acceptable for BLP claims (see WP:BLPPRIMARY) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

CINTAA, is not an accurate website providing illogical information about Bollywood personalities.

Aishwarya Rai, is cited as one of the most beautiful woman in the world, She got an blue-green eyes, everyone know about it. CINTAA, is the most accurate and reliable sources to prove Bollywood Personalities identifications. Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, CINTAA, profile identified her physicality as black eyes. ----> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/776

Membership, is not the issue, who edits the profiles? Anybody, the performer, or an editorial board at CINTAA?? but whoever edits the profiles do you think it is dubious at all, to identified her eyes as black.

But, still it is the most creditable and accurate sources, to prove an individual personality and identity, taking the feedback of CINTAA Profile, let's change Aishwarya Rai Bachchan physicality? We all blindfold ourselves, despite she was born with green-blue eyes let's her black eyes as CINTAA, provide so??

Whether it seems so dubious but let's do it, even Rose$keel, provide Shraddha Kapoor CINTAA source on quoting it is a DOB confirmed from the CINTAA website as specified in the link. CINTAA is an association of Cine artists in Mumbai which has illustrious members like Aishwarya bachan, Anil Kapoor etc. No more changes or deletions in Birthdate are allowed view the history for that.

Priyanka Chopra, CINTAA profile is presented as Priyanka Chopraa ---> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/1201, despite the fact that she is Priyanka Chopra, let's change her name as Priyanka Chopra to Priyanka Chopraa as it is published in CINTAA Profile. Despite, illogical information about Bollywood Personalities but still CINTAA, IS THE MOST ACCURATE AND RELIABLE SOURCE TO PROVE A BOLLYWOOD PERSONALITY INFORMATION.

Please, kindly visit CINTAA WEBSITE, and view celebrities profiles, It is quite logical to leave her DOB section blank, until we get an appropriate source.

Smauritius 17:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

The perfect evidence, that CINTAA, is not appropriate to be a reliable and accurate sources of DOB.

Okay, admit it CINTAA, Bollywood personalities went to their office to register, they can't lie about their age as the provide their legal documents to identify their age issue.

How Come, Kangna Ranaut, CINTAA Profile indicated her as (1986), ---> http://www.cintaa.net/membership/cintaa_profile/3724 but her official website and Wikipedia, indicated her (1987).

See this Kangna Ranaut, passport we seen by an authority, she lied about her real age, in her passport indicated her as (1981). ---> http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/celebrity/kangana-ranaut-lies-about-her-age-goes-from-28-to-22_26811.html BIG QUESTION, HOW COME THAT IF REALLY CINTAA IS A LEGIT SOURCES TO PROVE CELEBRITIES IDENTITY.

Smauritius 05:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

The sources of Shraddha Kapoor — 24 years old born (1989) and 21 years old born (1992).

She was interviewed by TOI— Times of India, she herself stated she is (24 years old—born 1989) ---> http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-04-21/news-interviews/38693520_1_dad-air-hostess-father-shakti-kapoor

But, many newspaper claimed her age (21 years old—born 1992), such as International Business Times—IBT, ----> http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/511874/20131007/shraddha-kapoor-commit-aditya-roy-kapur.htm

THE BEST CONSENSUS IS TO LEAVE HER DOB SECTION BLANK UNTIL WE GET A HINT. If Shraddha Kapoor, never stated she was 26 years old it is so dubious to add her age.

Smauritius 05:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

The only solution to cope Shraddha Kapoor age.

View the talk page, Shraddha Kapoor DOB , is claimed by a non-active user. The basis of CINTAA, her age cannot be proven. If Shraddha Kapoor, never spoken about she is 26 years old, it is still so dubious to add her DOB, in Wikipedia. This matter cannot be taken casually, we should dip in the depth of solutions. It might turn out into a legal issue of defaming a public figure identity. I have one solution, i work as a Journalist in Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation, i try to led down an interview with Shraddha Kapoor, and also try to perform some research work in CINTAA Cite Authorisation. If any, solution came out it will be more appropriate. The disputing of Shraddha Kapoor, pivotal involving are Smauritius, Geniac and Rose$keel dip into the matter.

Archana Ramdonee, Palabeuse Fer palab unpeu 15:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

@Smauritius: If you are able to get your research published by MBC, then it will be usable. If not, it will be unusable under the guideline WP:No original research. —C.Fred (talk) 16:00, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Talking about guidelines and policies of contributing in Wikipedia, CINTAA, is not an accurate and reliable source to prove Shraddha Kapoor, DOB and it has not yet prove as a validity source but yet,

it is still published and confirmed by Geniac.

I'll spending hours or days or even weeks to figure out the so-called policies of Wikipedia Foundation, and collaborate my work in positive way. By the way, thank you for your notifications, C.Fred I owe you I think.

Smauritius (' . ') 16:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

No, I am not pivotally involved in this dispute. If you disagree with Rose$keel, then you need to discuss it with Rose$keel. What are you claiming that I published and confirmed? I did no such thing with any information in this article. --Geniac (talk) 18:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

It's going to be three days, after all the dispute i had made. But, yet any discussion was not provided by Rose$keel. He/She is untraceable and unreachable. He came and claimed, accused and reported me, Geniac believe him/her to the tea. Providing dubious information to public figure is quite illegal, provide me the policies and guidelines if Wikipedia can support that. We don't have the right of making personal affliction which was exercised by Geniac and Rose$keel.

Because, of these fellow users Wikipedia had to suffer, such they had suffered in SOPA and PIPA cases. I working on the basis of guidelines and policies but yet seeing my past actions i was constantly warned, threatened, and reported by Geniac and Rose$keel. I will do my works and present it in Wikipedia in a respective manner. Smauritius (' . ') 18:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay so I realized someone changed her birthdate to 1987 born, and used a source that has questionable accuracy. And I remember watching an interview where Shraddha herself stated she was about 17-18 years old when her debut film, Teen Patti released. Now, Teen Patti released in 2010, thus making Shraddha Kapoor 1992 born. The link to the interview is here (please watch from 8:20-as that is where she talks about how old she was during the release of her debut film)-->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7vbA0uUdw0 Please and thank you. GrewalJ (talk) 12 October, 2013. —Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)