Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Bulzan: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Fbulzan - "→Carmen Bulzan: " |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science|list of Social science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science|list of Social science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 23:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)</small> |
||
*Provisional '''Delete'''. Despite the article's promotional nature there seems to be no pass of [[WP:Prof#C1]]. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 23:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC). |
*Provisional '''Delete'''. Despite the article's promotional nature there seems to be no pass of [[WP:Prof#C1]]. [[User:Xxanthippe|Xxanthippe]] ([[User talk:Xxanthippe|talk]]) 23:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC). |
||
Thanks for the reviews so far. I will add more references to the mentioned information so it can better validate and prove the impact of the accomplishments. |
Thanks for the reviews so far. I will add more references to the mentioned information so it can better validate and prove the impact of the accomplishments. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fbulzan|Fbulzan]] ([[User talk:Fbulzan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fbulzan|contribs]]) 11:14, 14 October 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 11:15, 14 October 2013
- Carmen Bulzan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nice résumé, but I fail to see convincing evidence the subject passes WP:PROF. I do see the article is authored by single-purpose account Fbulzan... - Biruitorul Talk 14:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Provisional Delete. Despite the article's promotional nature there seems to be no pass of WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC).
Thanks for the reviews so far. I will add more references to the mentioned information so it can better validate and prove the impact of the accomplishments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fbulzan (talk • contribs) 11:14, 14 October 2013 (UTC)